Two patients were presented, and two previously unreported observations were made. Patient 1, a 50 year old man with episodic palpitations and dizziness for 10 years, exhibited initiation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) by atrial fibrillation (AF). Patient 2, a 43 year old woman with a structurally normal heart but recurrent palpitations for one year, demonstrated fusion and capture beats during simultaneous VT and AF. An explanation is given as to why the latter phenomenon is rarely observed.
- ventricular tachycardia
- atrial fibrillation
- atrioventricular nodal conduction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Patient 1, a 50 year old man with complaints of episodic palpitations and associated dizziness for 10 years, was diagnosed with an idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (VT) of apicoseptal origin. ECG revealed a regular broad QRS tachycardia (QRS width 190 ms, cycle length 260 ms and right bundle branch block morphology) with a north west QRS axis.
During electrophysiological study, there was no ventriculoatrial conduction and VT was easily induced. Subsequently, during catheter manipulation, sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) occurred, which reinitiated the VT (fig 1). Few narrow QRS beats varying in QRS width and with incomplete right bundle branch morphology were seen, during simultaneous VT and AF, suggestive of fusion beats.
Patient 2 was a 43 year old woman with a structurally normal heart, who had complained of recurrent palpitations for one year, four times associated with collapse. A regular, broad QRS tachycardia (QRS width 130 ms, cycle length 380 ms, and left bundle branch block morphology) with an intermediate axis was documented.
During electrophysiological study, three VTs with left bundle branch block morphology were induced. There was 2:1 and 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction respectively during the first two VT morphologies. Sustained AF occurred spontaneously and repeatedly initiated the third VT, after a longer RR interval. Narrow QRS beats, resembling sinus QRS complex, were then observed (fig 2).
These cases illustrate two uncommon findings, initiation of idiopathic VT during AF and the occurrence of fusion and capture beats following atrioventricular (AV) conduction, during simultaneous VT and AF.
AF provides rapid and irregular RR intervals. Idiopathic left VT is probably based on a re-entrant mechanism, and right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia could be due to triggered activity or abnormal automaticity.1 In patient 1, a long–short RR interval sequence during AF could create unidirectional block and start re-entry. Long preceding RR intervals have been noted in 77% of cases with “repetitive monomorphic VT and a structurally normal heart”.2 In patient 2, irregular RR intervals during AF could lead to rapid escalation of the pause dependent after depolarisations above a critical threshold initiating VT. On the other hand, overdrive excitation during AF could lead to Ca2+overloading and abnormal automaticity.3
Witkampf et al showed that in patients with AF, ventricular pacing may prevent atrial impulses from reaching the ventricle.4 In patient 1, the absence of ventriculoatrial conduction may indicate lack of retrograde invasion into the conduction system, but the fast VT rate (260 ms) allows only a small window of ventricular excitability. In patient 2, 1:1 and 2:1 ventriculoatrial conduction was present during two VT morphologies, suggesting that antegradely conducted supraventricular impulses may capture the ventricle even in patients with a capacity for ventriculoatrial conduction. Apparently, not every beat of the VT penetrated retrogradely in the AV conduction system. Therefore, to have capture and fusion beats during AF and VT, there must be no constant retrograde invasion into the AV conduction system; a sufficiently short antegrade AV nodal refractory period limiting “concealed” AV nodal conduction; and a VT rate allowing the ventricle to be excitable when the supraventricular impulse arrives in the ventricle. This explains why the phenomenon of capture and fusion beats during AF and VT is seen so rarely.