OBJECTIVE To report the mortality of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVD), assessed objectively by echocardiography, and its association with natriuretic peptide hormones in a random sample of 1640 men and women aged 25–74 years from a geographical, urban population.
METHODS Left ventricular function was measured by echocardiography in 1640 attendees studied in 1992–3. LVD was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ⩽ 30%. Plasma concentrations of N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured by standard radioimmunoassays. Mortality was documented at four years.
RESULTS The four year all cause mortality rate in the whole cohort was 4.9% (80 deaths). It was 21% (nine deaths) in those with an LVEF ⩽ 30% and 4% in those whose LVEF was > 30% (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) BNP concentration in those who died was 16.9 pg/ml (8.8–27) and 7.8 pg/ml (3.4–13) in survivors (p < 0.0001). Similarly, N-ANP had a median concentration of 2.35 ng/ml (1.32–3.36) in those with a fatal outcome and 1.27 ng/ml (0.9–2.0) in those alive at four years (p < 0.0001). Subjects with an LVEF ⩽ 40% also had a significant mortality rate of 17% if they also had a BNP concentration ⩾ 17.9 pg/ml compared with 6.8% if their BNP was below this concentration (p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed the independent predictors of four year all cause mortality to be increasing age (p < 0.001), a BNP concentration ⩾ 17.9 pg/ml (p = 0.006), the presence of ischaemic heart disease (p = 0.03), and male sex (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS LVD is associated with a considerable mortality rate in this population. BNP also independently predicts outcome. In addition to its role as a diagnostic aid in chronic heart failure and LVD, it provides prognostic information and clarifies the meaning of a given degree of LVD.
- left ventricular dysfunction
- natriuretic peptides
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is usually caused by left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) that, in most cases, is systolic in nature. It is often preceded by a latent phase of asymptomatic LVD. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LVD are common in the general population.1
CHF has long been known to carry a poor prognosis.2 There is good evidence from both epidemiological studies and the “heart failure” treatment trials to substantiate that, in its severest categories, its mortality rate exceeds that of many of the common cancers.3-6 The mortality conferred by the main precursor of CHF—LVD—has, however, been derived mainly from the heart failure and post-myocardial infarction angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trials.7-9 A few population based studies have documented the mortality of CHF resulting from LVD10 and, to date, none have reported on the mortality of the asymptomatic phase.
Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LVD is associated with increased circulating concentrations of the natriuretic peptide hormones: atrial (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).11 The N-terminals of ANP and BNP, in particular, have proved to be good markers of both development of CHF and prognosis in patient populations with LVD.12-15 When ANP and BNP have been compared in this regard, BNP has emerged as the stronger predictor of mortality.13-15 However, their ability to determine prognosis in the general population is unknown.
This study reports, firstly, the mortality associated with LVD (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and, secondly, the ability of the natriuretic peptide hormones to determine that prognosis in a random, geographical sample of men and women aged 25–74 years.
The study population consisted of 2000 subjects aged 25–74 randomly sampled from north Glasgow who had attended the third Glasgow MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) risk factor survey in 1992. This parent population was obtained by a two stage random sampling procedure. Firstly, 30 family practitioners were randomly selected from the 210 in the area. Secondly, patients were randomly selected from each 10 year age/sex band from 25–74 years in proportion to the doctor's list of patients. The population was oversampled to allow for non-response (response rate 67%). All responders were invited to attend the present study. Of the 2000 invited, 1653 attended (83%).
We used a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculated by the biplane disc summation method (Simpson's rule) as our ideal for left ventricular function. This was obtainable in 89.5% of subjects. LVEF⩽ 30% was defined as significant LVD because it is a 33% reduction in the mean value of 47.2% for “normal” subjects within this population. The echocardiographic methods are described in more detail elsewhere.1
Standard 12 lead ECGs were coded using the Minnesota coding criteria.16 ECGs were classified as “ischaemic” if they contained a pathological Q wave or an ST/T segment abnormality. The ECGs were all coded by two readers and discrepancies in coding were adjudicated by a third coder.
VENOUS BLOOD SAMPLES
Venous blood was withdrawn after 20 minutes of supine rest into chilled tubes containing EDTA and trasylol (50 U/ml). Both N terminal ANP (N-ANP) and BNP concentrations were measured after extraction from plasma by standard radioimmunoassays (Peninsula, California, USA) and have been previously described in detail.11 ,17 ,18Natriuretic peptide concentrations were analysed in 1252 subjects.
QUESTIONNAIRE AND OTHER MEASUREMENTS
A self reported questionnaire was obtained for all subjects giving details of a prior history of myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension, or diabetes. Drug treatment was also recorded. Blood pressure was measured with a random zero sphygmomanometer (mean of two readings). Hypertension was defined as a history of hypertension, a measured blood pressure of > 140 mm Hg systolic or > 90 mm Hg diastolic, or current treatment with an antihypertensive agent.
Diabetes was defined as either a history of diabetes or the current prescription of either an oral hypoglycaemic agent or insulin.
The presence of a myocardial infarction was diagnosed either if a subject gave a history of prior myocardial infarction or by the presence of a pathological Q wave on the ECG. Angina was determined by a history of physician diagnosed angina or the current use of nitrate drugs. The category “ischaemic heart disease” was defined as either the presence of angina, or a history or ECG evidence of ischaemia or myocardial infarction.
MORTALITY AND CLASSIFICATION OF CAUSE OF DEATH
The main mortality reported is all cause at four years of follow up.
Cause of death was classified by three independent observers (TMCD, HJD, and ADC) scrutinising the death certificate reports. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The categories assigned were as follows:
Coronary heart disease—including death from myocardial infarction, angina, and ischaemic heart disease occurring in position one.
Cardiovascular—the above causes and deaths resulting from cerebrovascular disease, mesenteric emboli, and peripheral vascular disease (mainly ruptured abdominal aortic aneursym).
Cancer—deaths with a malignant tumour in position one.
Other—deaths not accounted for in any of the above categories—for example, suicide, drowning, perforated duodenal ulcer, etc.
The concentrations of the natriuretic peptides are expressed as medians with the interquartile ranges in parentheses. The concentrations of the natriuretic peptides in survivors and non-survivors were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. A univariate Cox regression survival analysis was used to determine univariate predictors of all cause mortality. A stepwise (forward) multiple Cox regression survival analysis was carried out to determine the independent predictors of that mortality. Variables included in the model were those that achieved significance as univariate variables. Entry into the model was at the 5% level and removal at the 10% cut off point. In the multiple regression analysis age was treated as a continuous variable (hazard ratios were determined for five year increments); all other covariates were categorical. Of the categorical variables all were dichotomous with the exception of “smoking”, which was divided into current, former, and never. The cut off points for LVD and the concentrations of BNP and N-ANP were 30%, 17.9 pg/ml, and 1.76 ng/ml, respectively.1 ,11 Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for a BNP cut off point of 17.9 pg/ml, LVEF categories of ⩽ 30%, ⩽ 35%, and ⩽ 40%, and an LVEF ⩽ 40% stratified according to the BNP cut off point. Differences between the resulting survival curves were assessed by the log rank test. Significance was taken as a p < 0.05.
Ethical approval was obtained from both the hospital and the local general practitioner ethical committees.
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population in whom an echocardiogram was obtainable; 1640 attended for screening, 1467 (89.5%) had an analysable echocardiogram, and 1252 (76%) subjects had both a venous blood sample and an analysable echocardiogram available.
The cohort was screened in 1992–3. This analysis refers to four years of follow up.
The four year all cause mortality rate in the cohort was 4.9% (80 deaths). Thirty seven (47%) of these were cardiovascular in nature, 24 (30%) resulted from coronary heart disease, 30 were attributable to cancer (38%), and 12 (15%) were classified as “other”. Because of the relatively small number of deaths for each cause, all subsequent analysis refers to all cause mortality.
Table 2 lists the four year mortality rates according to subjects' baseline LVEF category. In those with significant LVD, the all cause four year mortality rate was 21% (nine) compared with 4% (58) in those whose LVEF was greater than 30% (p < 0.0001). The all cause mortality was 20% (four) in subjects with symptomatic LVD and 25% (five) in asymptomatic LVD (NS). Similarly, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in the mortality of any degree of LVD, whether LVEF was ⩽ 40% or ⩽ 35%.
The median (interquartile range) BNP concentration in those who died, irrespective of the cause, was 16.9 pg/ml (8.8–27) compared with 7.8 pg/ml (3.4–13) in survivors (p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients who died had a median concentration of N-ANP of 2.35 ng/ml (1.32–3.36) compared with 1.27 ng/ml (0.9–2.0) in those alive at four years (p < 0.0001).
Table 3 lists the results of the univariate Cox regression analysis for all cause mortality. The significant univariate predictors were age, male sex, the presence of ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, significant LVD or diabetes, being a former smoker, or having a BNP concentration ⩾ 17.9 pg/ml or an N-ANP concentration ⩾ 1.76 ng/ml. Entering these variables into a stepwise Cox regression model resulted in four variables being included in the model: advancing age (per five year increment p < 0.0001, hazard ratio 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 1.6)), a BNP concentration ⩾ 17.9 pg/ml (p = 0.006, hazard ratio 2.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.8), the presence of ischaemic heart disease (p = 0.03, hazard ratio 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.2), and male sex (p = 0.04, hazard ratio 1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1). When N-ANP was substituted for BNP in the model, N-ANP did not achieve significance. Similarly, when N-ANP or LVD (LVEF ⩽ 30%) was forced into the model, BNP was still significant.
Figure 1 depicts the Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by LVEF categories. It can be seen that survival was poorest in those with an LVEF⩽ 30% (21% four year mortality), was intermediate at 13.3% in those with an LVEF⩽ 35%, and was still significantly increased at 9.8% in those with LVEF⩽ 40% (p < 0.001).
Mortality also increased as the concentration of BNP increased. These data are shown for four cut off points of BNP in fig2.
Figure 3 shows Kaplan-Meier survival curves constructed for all cause mortality stratified according to the optimum diagnostic concentration BNP of ⩾ 17.9 or < 17.9 pg/ml (p < 0.001). Repeating the analysis for those with an LVEF ⩽ 40% stratified according to the presence or absence of an increased BNP concentration (⩾ 17.9 pg/ml) showed that those with a high BNP had a four year all cause mortality rate of 17% compared with 6.8% in those with a BNP concentration < 17.9 pg/ml (p = 0.013) (fig 4).
Patients with preserved systolic function (LVEF > 40%) also had a significantly higher mortality if the BNP concentration was ⩾ 17.9 pg/ml at 8.5% (n = 16 of 118) compared with 2% (n = 21 of 891) in those with a BNP concentration < 17.9 pg/ml (p < 0.0001).
This is the first reported study of the mortality associated with LVD in an unselected population derived from the community as opposed to that of patients recruited for clinical trials. We have shown that significant LVD is associated with a substantial mortality rate of 21%, five times that of the general population with LVEF > 30% and six times that of patients with LVEF > 40%. Our study included subjects with both symptomatic and asymptomatic LVD, and is not directly comparable with other epidemiological studies of the mortality of CHF, the symptomatic end of the spectrum. At the same time, LVD in our study conferred an increment in mortality similar to that of the population in the Framingham heart study's 40 year follow-up, in which the CHF mortality rate was six times that of the age corrected normal population.3 The absolute five year all cause mortality rates in the Framingham cohort were higher (75% in men and 62% in women), as was the 34% one year mortality rate in another US study from Rochester, Minnesota, reflecting the fact that these subjects were symptomatic.6 Our data are more in keeping with those reported for mild to moderate CHF by Eriksson (five year mortality rate of 26%).19 Compared with the only other epidemiological study to report the mortality rate associated with CHF and LVD (LVEF < 50%), our rate of 21% at four years was higher than their rate of 18% at five years.20 This difference may, of course, be explained by the different ejection fraction cut off points used.
We did not find any difference in mortality rates between symptomatic and asymptomatic LVD. There are, however, insufficient numbers of deaths in these categories, so far, to draw any firm conclusions about this. Interestingly, our four year all cause mortality rates for LVD lie between those of the placebo arms of the SOLVD (studies of left ventricular dysfunction) prevention study at 15.8%8 and the treatment study at 39%.7
Our results are unlikely to be significantly confounded by the effects of drugs because only 19% of our patients with symptomatic LVD were being treated with an ACE inhibitor and the time scale of our study predates the routine use of β adrenoceptor blockade for heart failure.
Our study has also shown, for the first time in the general population aged 25–74 years, that BNP is an independent predictor of all cause mortality. In terms of population based work the only other study of the power of BNP in determining subsequent all cause prognosis is that of Wallen and colleagues,21 who similarly found BNP to be the best predictor of death in 541 elderly patients over the age of 85 years. Other work in an elderly population has also shown that ANP is associated with an adverse prognosis.22 This work reinforces the earlier studies in patient populations, which have vindicated the utility of BNP in determining mortality after myocardial infarction and in CHF.12-15
Our results also confirm previous reports comparing N-ANP with BNP in predicting mortality, showing that BNP is superior in this regard.13-15
In an earlier study documenting the prevalence of LVD in this population,1 we tackled the question, “What is abnormal left ventricular function?” given that LVEF is normally distributed. In an individual patient, statistically normal or abnormal values may have little meaning; the change from their premorbid ejection fraction is more likely to be important. This work allows us to ascertain more clearly what constitutes LVD in that a meaningful test of left ventricular function should give some indication of prognosis. Our original assumption that an LVEF ⩽ 30% is biologically abnormal has been confirmed in that this group of patients had the poorest survival. However, subjects with LVEF ⩽ 35% and ⩽ 40% also have a higher mortality rate. The cut off point of 40% is also well within the statistical boundaries of normality for our measurement of LVEF in this population. Our results point to a role for BNP in clarifying whether a given LVEF is indeed biologically abnormal, in that subjects with an LVEF ⩽ 40% who had a raised BNP concentration had a four year mortality rate of 17% (much closer to the LVEF ⩽ 30% level of 21%) compared with only 6.8% in those with LVEF⩽ 40% with a low BNP concentration.
These findings raise some speculation as to why BNP is associated with mortality. The possibilities for this include that it is merely reflecting cardiac or left ventricular dysfunction more accurately than current cardiological measurements of these parameters.
Several cardiological reasons may account for the association of an abnormally high BNP concentration and an LVEF that can be variously described as “borderline” or even “preserved”. Firstly, a patient may originally have had a much higher LVEF that, as a result of intervening cardiac pathology, is now lower but still within the statistically normal range. Alternatively, an abnormality of ventricular function other than systolic dysfunction, such as abnormal relaxation or “diastolic dysfunction”23—for example, caused by left ventricular hypertrophy—may be responsible for the elevation in BNP concentration.24 Interestingly, in this study patients with preserved systolic function who had a high BNP concentration also had a worse prognosis. Non-cardiological causes of a raised BNP such as renal impairment also have to be borne in mind.23 Alternatively, it may be reflecting pre-morbid multisystem dysfunction with not only deteriorating cardiac function but also renal impairment, which is known to increase circulating concentrations of natriuretic peptide hormones.25 Lastly, it is also possible that BNP may have a deleterious pathophysiological role in causing a decline in left ventricular function. There is some preliminary evidence to support this, in that ANP has been shown to cause apoptosis in rat myocytes.26
Any detailed discussion or indeed statistical analysis relating left ventricular function or natriuretic peptides to the causes of death in our study has to be avoided because we are limited by the relatively small number of deaths at this point in follow up and this will be the subject of further study.
In our previous published work, we have shown that LVD is common, that much of it is asymptomatic, that it is undertreated, and that it is detectable by BNP analysis.1 ,11 This study has added to the overall picture of LVD in the population by confirming that it is associated with a substantial mortality rate. This reinforces the need to diagnose LVD, be it asymptomatic or symptomatic, earlier and more accurately, to improve eventually its poor outlook. The case for BNP having a role in facilitating that diagnosis, in interpreting the importance of the degree of left ventricular dysfunction, and in estimating prognosis is becoming difficult to ignore.
This study was funded by a grant from the Scottish Office Home and Health Department. The natriuretic peptide assays were funded by Merck Sharpe and Dohme. The echocardiograms were performed by Mrs E Rooney.