OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of recanalisation on collateral flow in a case–control study in patients with and without chronic total coronary occlusions.
DESIGN In 54 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (mean (SD) age 61 (6) years), coronary collateral flow was measured by intracoronary pressure or Doppler guide wires at the end of repeated balloon occlusions. Coronary collateral flow index (collateral flow relative to normal antegrade flow) during the first two balloon inflations in 27 patients with a chronic total occlusion (occlusion group) was compared with that of 27 patients matched for age, sex, and collateral flow index at the first occlusion and with a coronary artery diameter stenosis ⩽ 80% (stenosis group).
RESULTS Following revascularisation, collateral flow index decreased in 17 of the patients in the occlusion group (63%) and in eight of the patients in the stenosis group (30%) (p = 0.03 between groups). The overall change of collateral flow index between the first and the second balloon occlusion was −0.04 (0.01) in the occlusion group (p = 0.07 for paired comparison; from 0.29 (0.17) to 0.25 (0.14)), and +0.02 (0.06) in the stenosis group (p = 0.06 for paired comparison; from 0.27 (0.13) to 0.30 (0.15)). The trend to collateral enhancement in the stenosis group differed significantly from the occlusion group (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS While repeated coronary balloon occlusions induce collateral recruitment in the majority of patients with moderate stenoses, recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions is more often associated with collateral flow reduction. A later decrease in collateral flow by involution of collateral channels cannot be excluded by this study but has not been reported so far.
- coronary collateral circulation
- coronary occlusion
- collateral damage
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In patients with coronary artery disease, the collateral circulation supplying myocardium distal to a stenosis or occlusion can minimise infarct size, reduce evolution of left ventricular aneurysm formation, improve ventricular function, and lead to improved survival.1-3 More than one third of patients with significant coronary artery disease present with chronic total coronary occlusions.4 5 Despite the fact that chronic total occlusions are the prime contraindication for angioplasty, they account for 10% of angioplasty interventions.5-7
There have been case reports8 9 documenting a possible negative effect of recanalisation of total coronary occlusions on collateral flow. In an uncontrolled study including 18 patients, a reduction of myocardial perfusion in segments receiving collateral flow was found after recanalisation.10 Collateral perfusion was assessed using semiquantitative intracoronary contrast echocardiography (visual score for video density), a rather imprecise method for assessing collateral flow.
There has been speculation about the reason for a negative effect of recanalisation on collateral flow. Thrombotic material may be mobilised by the procedure to disturb the downstream circulation,8 9 or vasoactive substances may be released through the intervention to cause a reduction in collateral flow.8
In the present investigation we tested the influence of recanalisation of coronary occlusions on the collateral circulation using intracoronary measurements, and compared the results with those in matched cases of coronary stenosis.
We studied 54 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with at least two subsequent one minute balloon occlusions. Their mean (SD) age was 61 (6) years. Nine were women and 55 were men. There were no cases of Q wave myocardial infarction. Patients were selected retrospectively and divided into two groups: a group with structural or functional chronic total coronary occlusion (for more than one month; thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trial (TIMI) flow grading of ⩽ 1) (occlusion group, n = 27); and a group with diameter stenoses of ⩽ 80% (stenosis group, n = 27). The two groups were matched for age, sex, and collateral flow index (see below) at the end of the first coronary occlusion. The data were derived from separately reported prospective studies,11-14 approved by the local ethics committee and with informed consent of the patients.
Patients underwent left heart catheterisation, including biplane left ventricular angiography and coronary angiography for diagnostic purposes. Coronary artery stenoses were assessed quantitatively as per cent diameter reduction, using the guiding catheter for calibration. Aortic pressure was measured using the 6 French angioplasty guiding catheter.
COLLATERAL FLOW MEASUREMENTS
Coronary collaterals were assessed using intracoronary pressure (n = 46) or Doppler (n = 8) guide wires for PTCA. The 0.014 inch fibreoptic pressure guide wire (WaveWire, Endosonics, Rancho Cordova, California, USA) was set at zero, calibrated, advanced through the guiding catheter, normalised for aortic pressure at the ostium of the coronary artery, and positioned distal to the stenosis to be dilated. The pressure derived collateral flow index (no units) was determined by simultaneous measurement of mean aortic pressure (Pao, mm Hg) and the distal intracoronary pressure at the end of a one minute balloon occlusion (coronary wedge pressure, Poccl, mm Hg) (figs 1 and 2). Central venous pressure (CVP) was estimated to be 5 mm Hg. Collateral flow index was calculated as (Poccl − CVP) divided by (Pao − CVP).12 15 We showed that the intracoronary pressure was not reliable in patients with a left ventricular end diastolic pressure of ⩾ 15 mm Hg before vessel occlusion.16 In this case, intracoronary flow velocity measurements were used to assess the collateral flow index (n = 8). Velocity derived collateral flow index measurements were performed using a 0.014 inch Doppler guide wire with a 12 MHz piezoelectric crystal at its tip (FlowWire®, Endosonics, Rancho Cordova, California, USA). The validation of this wire has been described previously.17 Velocity derived collateral flow index was determined as the ratio of flow velocity–time integral distal to the occluded stenosis divided by the baseline flow velocity integral obtained at the same site after PTCA and following reactive hyperaemia.12 Bidirectional flow velocity signals were added to obtain total collateral flow velocity. The collateral flow index expresses collateral flow relative to normal antegrade flow in a patent epicardial vessel. The two methods used to assess collateral flow index have been validated previously.12
Angiographic collateral degree was determined according to the extent of the epicardial coronary artery filling via collaterals with contrast medium from the contralateral side before PTCA: 0 = no filling of the distal vessel; 1 = small side branches filled; 2 = major side branches filled; 3 = main vessel filled.
Collateral flow index was assessed at the end of subsequent one minute balloon occlusions. The first collateral flow index was measured at the end of the first one minute balloon occlusion of the coronary lesion; the second and final index was assessed at the end of the next one minute balloon occlusion. The change in the index at these subsequent balloon occlusions (ΔCFI) was calculated as the index at the second balloon occlusion minus that at the first.
The unpaired Student t test was used for comparison of continuous variables and the χ2 test for comparison of categorical variables among the two study groups. The paired Student t test was used for comparison of ΔCFI. Significance was defined at a probability value of p < 0.05.
There were no differences between the study groups with regard to sex, age, body mass index, mean blood pressure, or heart rate (table1).
There were four previous non-transmural myocardial infarctions in each of the groups. Patients in the occlusion group were significantly more likely to have diabetes mellitus than those in the stenosis group (30% v 7%, table 1). There was no difference between the groups for other cardiovascular risk factors. More patients in the occlusion group than in the stenosis group received calcium antagonists (22% v 4%). Treatment with β blockers, nitrates, acetylsalicylic acid, statins, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors did not differ between the groups (table 1).
The occlusion and stenosis groups did not differ in terms of the angiographic classification of coronary artery disease except for the severity of the stenosis undergoing PTCA (table 2). The left ventricular ejection fraction was 64% in the occlusion group and 69% in the stenosis group (table 2).
COMPARISON OF COLLATERAL FLOW DURING THE FIRST TWO BALLOON OCCLUSIONS
The angiographic collateral degree was 2.3 (0.8) in the occlusion group and 0.8 (0.7) in the stenosis group, respectively. Collateral flow index at the first occlusion was 0.29 (0.2) in the occlusion group and 0.27 (0.1) in the stenosis group; this decreased to 0.25 (0.14) at the second balloon occlusion in the occlusion group, and increased to 0.30 (0.15) in the stenosis group (fig 3; p = 0.1 for difference at the second balloon occlusion). Immediately after recanalisation, collateral flow index decreased (fig 1) in 17 of the 27 patients in the occlusion group, whereas it decreased in only eight of the 27 patients in the stenosis group (63% v 30%; p = 0.03 between groups, table 3 and fig 3). In 10 patients (37%) in the occlusion group, collateral flow index increased whereas it increased in 17 (63%) of the stenosis group (fig 2). Collateral flow index remained unchanged in two patients in the stenosis group (table 3).
Mean ΔCFI was −0.04 (0.01) (p = 0.07, for paired comparison) in the occlusion group, and +0.02 (0.06) (p = 0.06) in the stenosis group. Unpaired comparison of ΔCFI showed a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.01, fig 4).
This case–control study in patients with similar baseline collateral flow to a coronary region undergoing revascularisation showed that individuals with chronic total occlusions had an overall decrease in collateral flow of 14% following recanalisation, whereas those with mild to moderate stenotic lesions had an overall recruitment in collateral flow of 7% at the second of two subsequent balloon occlusions.
ROLE OF COLLATERALS IN CORONARY OCCLUSIONS
A total coronary occlusion happening insidiously is probably collateralised. The final occlusion occurs without myocardial infarction or with only limited infarction. If the collateral flow to the occluded vascular region amounts to more than 25% of the normal flow,12 18 there might not even be angina at rest, and myocardial function in the collateral dependent area will be maintained.19 However, effort induced angina brings such patients to percutaneous revascularisation.20-22 Opening occluded coronary arteries, especially the left anterior descending, may improve symptoms, obviate the need for bypass surgery, and even improve prognosis.23-25 In the light of the still relatively low technical success rate and only moderate clinical improvement to be expected with recanalisation, moderation in attempting PTCA in these cases is called for.26 Moreover, the risk of restenosis and reocclusion is increased in the presence of the well developed collaterals typical of chronic coronary occlusions subjected to PTCA.27-32 Reocclusion may cause clinical events in the case of intervention related damage to collaterals.8 The present study investigated whether damage to collaterals following revascularisation occurs in the form of impaired collateral recruitability, represented by a decrease in collateral flow on repeated coronary occlusions. Disappearance of angiographic collaterals after recanalisation is a marker of the success of the intervention.33 However, this cannot be interpreted as damage to collaterals caused by the PTCA. It is related simply to the diminishing pressure gradient between the collateral receiving artery and the collateral supplying artery upon the restoration of antegrade flow. Nevertheless, impairment of recruitability of collaterals is conceivable and may be transient, mediated by a release of constrictive mediators by the recanalisation. It may also be permanent, resulting from obstruction of the collateral channels by macro- and microemboli. Finally, loss of collaterals may be late, resulting from atrophy of no longer required channels. This would be only slowly reversible in the case of later reocclusion. Case reports documenting immediate recruitability of collaterals several years after they had been taken out of use by successful recanalisation34 35 do not exclude this latter mechanism. They merely show cases where it did not apparently play a role.
BEHAVIOUR OF COLLATERALS FOLLOWING RECANALISATION OF OCCLUSIONS
In the setting of an uncontrolled study investigating the behaviour of collaterals after total occlusion revascularisation, patients with high initial collateral flow are likely to be selected owing to the direct relation between stenosis severity and collateral flow. Among more than 400 patients examined for collateral assessment at our laboratory, the 40 with collateralised total occlusions undergoing revascularisation had a collateral flow index sufficient to prevent myocardial ischaemia during vessel obstruction (⩾ 0.25) in 72%, whereas the patients with non-occlusive stenotic lesions had a collateral flow index of < 0.25 in 71%. It is possible that a high baseline collateral flow index is associated with a more pronounced reduction in flow following recanalisation than recanalysed occlusions with a lower baseline collateral flow index. Thus the phenomenon of collateral flow decrease may be amplified by greater changes in driving forces across the collaterals after the restoration of antegrade flow: a greater degree of post-PTCA, flow related collateral vasoconstriction—owing to a more pronounced reduction in intercoronary driving pressure in initially extensive versus sparse collaterals—may affect collateral flow alterations on biophysical grounds. To account for these possibilities, we used a case–control study design in our investigation, and patients with and without occlusions were matched for baseline collateral flow index.
Little is known about the magnitude or timing of collateral flow changes following restitution of antegrade flow in total occlusions. Contrast echocardiographic imaging of the collateralised myocardium has shown that the collateral supplied microcirculation (about 10 μm in diameter36) persists for at least 15 minutes after recanalisation of the occlusion, whereas angiographically visible—that is, epicardial collaterals (about 100 μm)—disappear immediately.10 33 As collateral flow index measures the functional relevance of collaterals, it reflects collateralised myocardial perfusion more reliably than angiography; this has been supported very recently by the demonstration of a close, direct association between quantitatively assessed myocardial contrast echocardiography and simultaneously obtained collateral flow index.37 Thus the time window of the few minutes between the first and second balloon occlusion in our study suggests that the fall in collateral flow index cannot provide information about a possible late change. For instance, collateral opening during repetitive episodes of ischaemia in our controls (collateral recruitment) may not have been at its maximum when assessed at the second instead of at a third or fourth balloon occlusion.38 During a time window of 15 minutes at the most,10 recanalised total occlusions seem to be associated with collateral derecruitment rather than with recruitment, as seen in non-occlusive stenoses during repetitive ischaemia. Published reports indicate that this collateral derecruitment is a temporary dysfunction33 39 and not a reflection of permanent damage to the collaterals.9 According to our results there seems to be a risk of acute collateral impairment following recanalisation of total occlusion, as this was documented in 17 of the 27 patients with a decreasing collateral flow index (p = 0.0005 for paired comparison), although the overall difference did not reach statistical difference (fig 3).
Aside from the limitations discussed above, possible inaccuracies related to the technique used for collateral assessment need to be mentioned. CVP for the calculation of pressure derived collateral flow index was an estimate instead of a direct measurement in our patients. We measured CVP in 50 other patients in our institution (not included in the present study) and found that collateral flow index calculated by measured CVP was equal to 1.02 times collateral flow index computed by assumed CVP minus 0.03 (r 2 = 0.92, standard error of estimate = 0.04).40 Furthermore, even if the error were larger it would be evenly distributed among the two study groups, as the pressure derived collateral flow index was used to a similar extent in patients with (n = 22) and without (n = 24) occlusions. Thus the patients undergoing Doppler derived collateral flow index measurements were almost identically dispersed between the two groups, and the influence of possible errors related to the Doppler derived versus the pressure derived technique to gauge collateral flow would have influenced the results of both groups similarly. These considerations are only of theoretical relevance as the standard error of the estimate between pressure derived and Doppler derived collateral flow index determinations is quite small (0.08), and because both values are interchangeable.12 The fact that the collateral flow index is known to be at variance with qualitative measurements of angiographic collateral degree and also with ECG signs of myocardial ischaemia obtained during coronary occlusion12 is, however, illustrated by the intergroup differences in those variables, despite similar collateral flow index values. It is uncertain whether this discrepancy influenced the degree of collateral recruitment in the stenosis group. Owing to the retrospective design of the study, with one minute instead of two to three minute balloon occlusions,38 collateral recruitment could not be determined entirely appropriately. However, this indicates that the difference between collateral flow attenuation in the occlusion group and recruitment in the stenosis group may even have been underestimated in our investigation. Conversely, the study only pertains to the first minutes after either a recanalisation of a chronic total occlusion or a stenosis of a previously patent vessel. No prediction can be made about later effects of recanalisation or stenosis reduction on collaterals.
While repetitive coronary balloon inflations induce collateral recruitment in the majority of patients with moderate stenoses, recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions is more often associated with collateral flow reduction. A later decrease in collateral flow by involution of collateral channels cannot be excluded by this study but has not been reported so far.