Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Transcardiac and transpulmonary gradients in the putative new cardiovascular hormone relaxin
  1. C Fisher1,
  2. S Al-Benna2,
  3. A Kirk2,
  4. J J Morton3,
  5. J J V McMurray1
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Western Infirmary
  3. 3Neuroendocrine Laboratory, Western Infirmary
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor John JV McMurray, Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Relaxin, a polypeptide hormone belonging to the insulin family, has recently attracted interest as a possible cardiovascular regulator.1 Though long known to prepare the birth canal for parturition, relaxin has only lately been shown to have renal and haemodynamic actions.2 Relaxin may also be secreted by the heart, at least when it is failing.3 Plasma relaxin concentrations are raised in chronic heart failure (CHF) and myocardial expression of the H1 and H2 relaxin gene is increased in proportion to the severity of CHF. Whether the heart is a source of relaxin when cardiac contractility is preserved is unknown. The lungs are commonly involved in the clearance or secretion of vasoactive peptides but their role in relaxin metabolism is unknown.4 The aim of this study was to measure transcardiac and transpulmonary relaxin gradients in subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were studied as both pulmonary and cardiac arterial inflow and venous effluent can be readily sampled.


Twenty consecutive patients were studied. Immediately before institution of cardiopulmonary bypass, blood samples were taken into chilled tubes, in rapid succession, from the aorta, coronary sinus, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary vein.4 A validated relaxin immunoassay was used (Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany).3 Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee.


Patient characteristics are shown in table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of patients studied

There was a decrement in the concentration of relaxin between aorta and coronary sinus in 16 of the 20 subjects studied, suggesting cardiac extraction of relaxin. The mean (SD) concentration fell from 38.1 (61.3) pg/ml to 32.8 (57.8) pg/ml (p < 0.04).

No characteristic differentiated the 16 patients with cardiac extraction of relaxin from the remaining four.

There was no transpulmonary gradient in relaxin concentration. The mean (SD) concentration in the pulmonary artery was 42.0 (68.3) pg/ml v 41.8 (69.1) pg/ml in the pulmonary vein (p = NS).


Dschietzig and colleagues showed higher coronary sinus than left ventricular relaxin concentrations in 11 of 14 patients with severe CHF, suggesting that the failing heart may be a source of circulating relaxin.3 We found the opposite across the non-failing heart—that is, net extraction of relaxin. Further inspection of the data from Dschietzig and colleagues shows no transcardiac gradient in patients with moderate CHF and an aorta–coronary sinus decrement in controls, in keeping with our findings.3 This suggests that the contribution of the heart to circulating relaxin varies according to the presence or absence of CHF. Whether it is left ventricular systolic dysfunction, abnormal pulmonary or systemic haemodynamics, neurohumoral activation or other factors that leads to net cardiac secretion of relaxin in CHF is presently unknown.

The pattern of relaxin secretion/extraction is distinct from other hormones. A type and B type natriuretic peptide increase from aorta to coronary sinus in both the non-failing and failing heart (more notably in the latter).4 Adrenomedullin is also secreted by both the failing and non-failing heart. In contrast, endothelin-1 is extracted by the failing heart, whereas there seems to be either no transcardiac gradient or higher coronary sinus concentrations in non-failing hearts.5 There is no transcardiac gradient in plasma aldosterone concentration in the non-failing heart but an increment in coronary sinus aldosterone concentration in CHF.

Interpretation of the cardiac extraction of relaxin by the normal heart, compared to its secretion by the failing heart, is difficult. The mechanisms of relaxin clearance from the circulation are unknown. Changes in the transcardiac concentration of other peptides seem to reflect changes in receptor density/affinity—for example, decreases in endothelin concentration across the failing heart are probably caused by the increase in myocardial ETA and ETB receptors.5 The receptors for relaxin have only recently been described and nothing is known about the effect of CHF on their expression.1

The transpulmonary gradient in relaxin concentration has not been described before. Neither net extraction nor secretion occurred, which is different than for other peptides. Pulmonary extraction of A type natriuretic peptide4 and adrenomedullin has been described. For endothelin, some have described no transpulmonary concentration gradient, others pulmonary extraction, and others still that both secretion and extraction, which balance each other out, occur.5 Relaxin also differs from other peptides in having no effect in small pulmonary resistance arteries (whereas it is a potent vasodilator in comparable vessels from the systemic circulation).2

In summary, in patients with coronary disease but without CHF, there is net cardiac extraction of relaxin in contrast to reported secretion in CHF. In patients without CHF there is no transpulmonary gradient in relaxin.


This study was supported by the British Heart Foundation.


View Abstract