Article Text

Download PDFPDF

How many cath labs do we need?
Free
  1. D Hackett,
  2. for the British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr David Hackett, Hemel Hempstead General Hospital, Hillfield Road, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP2 4AD, UK;
    dhackett{at}globalnet.co.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The need for laboratories for cardiac catheterisation and angiography, and pacemaker implantation, is assessed

The National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease (CHD) states that: “By international standards, the UK has high rates of CHD but low rates of coronary artery revascularisation. This does not appear to be because most other countries are over-using revascularisation but rather there has been under-provision of revascularisation in the UK. Another major difference between the UK and most other developed countries is that people in the UK wait considerably longer for investigation and treatment than people elsewhere.”1

The NSF has been welcomed by the cardiology community as a means to improve the medical management of people with coronary heart disease in England. Included among the various objectives and aims of the NSF are plans to increase the number of revascularisation procedures nationally to achieve more than 750 coronary artery bypass graft operations, and more than 750 percutaneous coronary interventional procedures, for each million population per year. Proposed maximum waiting times for investigation and treatment are specified in the NSF. In order to achieve more revascularisation operations, with shorter waiting times, it is obvious that more national capacity for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures is required.

Historically, the UK has been characterised by fewer numbers of revascularisation procedures, and fewer diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures, when compared with other countries in the European Community.2,3 In various European countries, the number of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures are usually in the range of 2.0–2.5 (mean 2.2) times the number of revascularisation procedures; and UK planning assumptions for the need for cardiac catheterisation and angiography have previously used a ratio of 2.0 times all cardiac surgical and interventional procedures, including valvar, electrophysiological, and other surgical operations.4,5 For planning purposes it would seem a reasonable surrogate measure to assume that the number of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures required would be a ratio of 2.2 (upper limit 2.5) times the number of cardiac revascularisation procedures performed or planned.

For medium term planning assumptions, therefore, it should be our aim to provide approximately at least 3300 (upper limit 3750) diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures for each million population per year; and more where the local burden of coronary disease is high.

PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION

Cardiac catheterisation laboratories are also used for pacemaker implantation, pacemaker lead monitoring, pacemaker lead extraction, cardiac defibrillator implantation, diagnostic and interventional cardiac electrophysiological procedures, as well as for percutaneous coronary interventions. The ideal facility for pacemaker implantation is an operating theatre or dedicated pacing laboratory in which the highest standards of sterility can be maintained; an alternative, but probably less satisfactory for sterile quality, is a shared cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Like other cardiac procedures, the UK has also been characterised by fewer numbers of pacemaker implants when compared with countries in the European Community.6,7 A proposed implant rate of 450 new systems and 100 replacement pacemakers for each million population per year would be comparable with current practice in many European countries, and be a prudent number to use for medium term planning purposes. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance on the indications and need for implantable cardiac defibrillators; they have estimated the overall need for new and replacement implantable cardiac defibrillators to be a total of 50 for each million population per year.8

The estimates made here of the population need for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures, pacemaker implantations, and implantable cardiac defibrillators are primarily for cardiac services based in secondary hospital care settings. The British Cardiac Society has published criteria for the provision and use of cardiac catheterisation laboratories in district general hospitals.9 The NSF has defined institutional and operator standards for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography.1 It is clear that cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures can and should be provided in cardiac departments in acute general (secondary care) hospitals serving an appropriate population size. The risks of elective diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography are relatively small, and it can be considered a relatively low risk intervention.10 Permanent pacemaker implantation and replacement is also a low risk intervention and appropriate to be performed in acute general hospitals.11

No attempt has been made to estimate the population demand or need for pacemaker lead angiographic monitoring, pacemaker lead extraction, diagnostic and interventional cardiac electrophysiological procedures (apart from implantable cardiac defibrillators), and percutaneous coronary interventions; the numbers for many of these procedures are rapidly increasing in the UK, and calculations of future need could not currently be projected with ease or confidence. Furthermore, these procedures are generally provided in tertiary care hospital settings, and are not currently or generally provided in most secondary care hospital settings.

LABORATORY REQUIREMENTS

From the above data, the laboratory requirements for cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures can be estimated at approximately 700–800 sessions for each million population per year; and for permanent pacemaker and cardiac defibrillator implantations to be approximately 300 sessions. Complete efficiency in use of cardiac laboratories cannot be assumed, and it would be prudent to provide some 15% excess capacity than the predicted need to allow for the inevitable peaks in demand.12 If an excess capacity of 15% is planned, the estimated annual requirements are approximately 830–950 and 330 sessions, respectively. These figures indicate a weekly need of 17–22 sessions for cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures, and 6–8 sessions for permanent pacemaker and cardiac defibrillator implantations, for each million population per year.

These data translate into a predicted need to provide:

  • one diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography laboratory per 450 000 to 600 000 population, and

  • one dedicated pacemaker and defibrillator implantation laboratory per 1.3 to 1.5 million population, or

  • one combined laboratory per 350 000 to 400 000 population if pacing and cardiac defibrillators are implanted in the same facility as diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and angiography.

These estimated needs will be subject to many other influences and trends, which are difficult to quantify at present. Although there has been a disproportionate decline in the mortality of coronary disease when compared with the incidence in the USA, Canada, Australia, and most western European countries,13–15 hospital admissions for coronary disease have actually increased.16 Trends suggest that coronary disease is being delayed and increasingly presents in a less severe form, possibly because of modification of coronary risk factors and with modern innovations in treatment. The favourable national trends in risk factors and mortality in the USA and Europe since 1965 have not resulted in much reduction of the national problem of cardiovascular disease. Morbidity and utilisation of health care services remain high. Secondly, on the other hand, factors leading to expected future reductions in coronary heart disease incidence, with fewer expected coronary events, might include secondary and primary prevention measures with statins, prevention associated with Our Healthier Nation initiatives, and an increase in the proportion of people receiving optimal medical treatments. Finally, training requirements—for example, in sessions in which a specialist registrar is being trained—would expect a longer duration of cases. The scheduled caseload might need to be reduced by perhaps 20% or 25% for those training sessions.

The need for and provision of laboratories for cardiac catheterisation and angiography and pacemaker implantation should be adjusted for:

  • the need for pacemaker lead extraction procedures, diagnostic and interventional cardiac electrophysiological procedures (apart from implantable cardiac defibrillators), and percutaneous coronary interventions, and

  • the local burden of disease, and

  • the possible reduction in local incidence of coronary morbidity in the future, and

  • training requirements, and

  • the independent (non-National Health Service) provision and use of local cardiology services.

The Royal College of Physicians and British Cardiac Society have advised that consultant job plans should include a specific number of fixed sessions, and that there should not be more than one session devoted to procedures in a cardiac catheterisation and angiography laboratory for consultants working in a secondary centre.17 This would require 24–29 whole time equivalent (WTE) consultant cardiologists per million population to perform cardiac catheterisation and angiography procedures, and pacing and defibrillator implantations, with the range depending on whether cover for leave is provided or not. If each consultant cardiologist in secondary care were to spend an average of 1.5 sessions each week devoted to these laboratory activities, then the range of required numbers of staff to perform these procedures would be 16–19 WTE consultants per million population. The Royal College of Physicians has estimated that the average number of cardiologists in 1997 was 10 per million population (= 1:102 299 population) in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.17 The Fifth report on the provision of services for patients with heart disease recommends an immediate increase in cardiologist staffing to 20 WTE consultants per million population (= 1:50 000), and a further increase to 25 WTE per million population (= 1:40,000) by 2010 to deliver modern cardiac services.18 Even this staffing level would still remain low when compared with other selected European countries, which have an average of 44 cardiologists per million population (1:23 000).19

The need for laboratories for cardiac catheterisation and angiography, and pacemaker implantation, is assessed

REFERENCES

View Abstract