Download PDFPDF

Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Authors' response to Dr Kelion
    • Roxy Senior, Consultant Cardiologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Mark Monaghan, Harald Becher, Jamil Mayet, Petros Nihoyannopoulos

    Dear Editor,

    We thank Dr Kelion for his helpful comments regarding our recent review on stress echocardiography in Heart [1]. We entirely agree with Dr Kelion that both British Society of Echocardiography and British Nuclear Cardiac Society need to raise awareness of the utility of functional tests for the assessment of coronary artery disease and not squabble about which technique is superior. Given the fact tha...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Nuclear response to stress echo review

    Dear Editor,

    The recent review of stress echocardiography in Heart is a good overview of a technique which has clearly come of age [1]. However it really is time that the echo community stopped being so defensive about the alternative technique of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).

    In November 2003 the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) published the positive results of its Technolo...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.