Article Text

Heart failure in patients with preserved and deteriorated left ventricular ejection fraction
  1. A Varela-Roman,
  2. L Grigorian,
  3. E Barge,
  4. P Bassante,
  5. M G de la Peña,
  6. J R Gonzalez-Juanatey
  1. Clinical University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr J R Gonzalez-Juanatey
    Clinical University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, Spain; jose.ramon.gonzalez.juanateysergas.es

Abstract

Objectives: To determine clinical and prognostic differences between preserved and deteriorated systolic function (defined as left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions ⩾ 50% and < 50%, respectively) in patients with heart failure satisfying modified Framingham criteria.

Patients and methods: Records were studied of 1252 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) (mean (SD) age 69.4 (11.7) years; 485 women, 767 men) who had been admitted to a cardiology service for CHF in the period 1991–2002 and whose LV systolic function had been echocardiographically evaluated within two weeks of admission. Data were collected on the main clinical findings, supplementary examinations, treatment, and duration of hospitalisation. Whether the patient was alive in the spring of 2003 was evaluated by searching the general archives of the hospital and by telephone survey.

Results: LV systolic function was preserved in 39.8% of patients. Age, female to male sex ratio, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation, valve disease, and other non-ischaemic, non-dilated cardiopathies were all significantly greater in the group with preserved systolic function. New York Heart Association functional class IV, third heart sound, jugular vein congestion, cardiomegaly, radiological signs of lung oedema, pathological Q waves, left bundle branch block, sinus rhythm, ischaemic cardiopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy were all significantly more prevalent in the group with deteriorated systolic function, as was treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and most other antihypertensive drugs on discharge from hospital. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups with preserved and deteriorated systolic function (either survival regardless of age at admission or in subgroups aged < 75 and ⩾ 75 years at admission). In the whole group, survival rates after one, three, and five years were 84.0%, 66.7%, and 50.9%, respectively.

Conclusion: In view of the poor prognosis of patients with CHF with preserved LV systolic function, who are currently treated empirically, it is to be hoped that relevant controlled clinical trials under way will afford information allowing optimisation of their treatment.

  • CHF, congestive heart failure
  • CHARM, candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity
  • DIAMOND, Danish investigations of arrhythmia and mortality on dofetilide
  • LV, left ventricular
  • LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction
  • NYHA, New York Heart Association
  • heart failure
  • prognosis
  • preserved systolic function
  • deteriorated systolic function
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

  • Error: Table 3, page 492.
    The 5 year survival for patients without LBBB is 50.9%, not 64.0% as stated in the table.

    Footnotes

      Request Permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.