Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Depression, indirect clinical markers of cardiac disease severity, and mortality following myocardial infarction
  1. D Lane1,
  2. C Ring2,
  3. G Y H Lip1,
  4. D Carroll2
  1. 1University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Deirdre Lane
    University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Based on observational epidemiological research, depression following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is considered an independent risk for subsequent mortality.1 This is despite the fact that in the only large scale randomised control trial to date, the successful treatment of depression yielded no relative advantage in terms of survival.2 Furthermore, not all prospective observational studies have found an association between depression following MI and mortality.3 In such studies, depression would not appear to be related to conventional indices of disease severity. Thus, where associations between depression following MI and mortality appear, they could reflect the confounding of depression with disease severity.4 We have discussed elsewhere5 why depression and disease severity might be correlated in some studies but not in others; we have argued that it depends on the accuracy of patients’ perceptions about the severity of their condition.

Although some, but by no means all, observational studies have attempted to control statistically for disease severity, the measures employed have been varied and all are imprecise indices …

View Full Text