Objective: To validate an intracoronary Doppler ultrasound device for high intensity transient signals (HITS) detection and to assess the incidence of HITS during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods and Results: In an in vitro model, particle count and number of HITS detected by an intracoronary 0.014 inch Doppler wire were closely correlated (r = 0.97, p < 0.001). In the clinical study, 32 patients (mean (SD) age 61 (11) years; 23 men, nine women) with coronary artery disease were treated with balloon dilatation and stent implantation for a single vessel stenosis. In these patients HITS were detected during PCI in 84% (27 of 32). Reproducibility (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and interobserver agreement (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) of HITS counts were significant. The number of HITS after stent implantation was significantly higher than after balloon dilatation (11 (7) v 2 (4), p < 0.001). Postprocedural coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was < 2.0 in 55% (16 of 29) of all patients after balloon dilatation and < 2.0 in 23% (six of 26) after stent implantation. The number of HITS after stent implantation did not differ significantly between patients with CFVR < 2.0 and patients with CFVR ⩾ 2.0 (12 (8) v 10 (7), not significant).
Conclusions: Embolic particles can be detected as HITS by an intracoronary Doppler ultrasound device. Coronary microembolism is often observed during PCI, especially after stent implantation. However, the incidence of HITS alone does not explain a reduced CFVR after PCI.
- APV, average peak velocity
- CFVR, coronary flow velocity reserve
- CK, creatine kinase
- HITS, high intensity transient signals
- PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
- blood flow
- coronary disease
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- APV, average peak velocity
- CFVR, coronary flow velocity reserve
- CK, creatine kinase
- HITS, high intensity transient signals
- PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a reduced coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is often observed, often associated with an increase of cardiac marker enzymes. Creatine kinase (CK) or CK-MB isoenzyme after PCI was reported to be increased in 3–30% of patients after PCI1–4 and troponin I or T was increased even more often in 30–40%.5–7 The rate of periprocedural increase of CK and troponin induced by stenting appeared to be greater than that after balloon angioplasty.8 The clinical implications of small troponin rises after PCI are not yet determined. but periprocedural CK-MB increases have been associated with a high risk of adverse cardiac events.3,4,9
The pathogenesis of the enzyme increase has been the subject of recent controversy. Microvascular obstruction by inflammation, oedema, reperfusion injury, and coronary microembolisation are likely explanations.10 New devices, which provide distal protection during transcatheter treatment of aortocoronary saphenous vein graft stenosis, have supported the concept of coronary microembolisation.10,11 Thrombotic and non-thrombotic material ranging in size from 100–550 μm was detected in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts as well as in native coronary arteries.12
Microembolisation in the intracranial cerebral arteries can be detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasound.13 Brief, high intensity transient signals (HITS) in the Doppler velocity spectrum correspond to microemboli made of thrombotic and non-thrombotic material in laboratory models.14,15 In clinical practice HITS have been reported in patients with a variety of potential cardiac sources of microembolism.16–18
To investigate coronary microembolisation during PCI further, a direct assessment of microembolisation such as that established for the cerebrovascular circulation would be desirable. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of using a Doppler ultrasound device dedicated to detecting HITS in coronary arteries, firstly in an in vitro model with artificial embolic particles, and subsequently in coronary arteries during PCI. It was our goal to investigate whether intracoronary Doppler can be used to detect coronary microemboli and whether the incidence of microembolism is directly related to the CFVR after PCI.
Criteria for the definition of HITS
The signals were defined by the following characteristics: high intensity; short duration; unidirectionality within the Doppler velocity spectrum; and being accompanied by a “snap”, “chirp”, or “moan” on the audible output. The signals were recorded on Super VHS tape and analysed off line for HITS. Two observers had to agree that the signal met the identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals.19,20
The intensity increase of HITS was unidirectional within the Doppler velocity spectrum and maximal over a narrow frequency range (fig 1A, B). The intensity increase of artefact signals was bidirectional and maximal at low frequencies (fig 1C, D).
In vitro experimental setup
A 0.014 inch guidewire with a 12 MHz pulsed Doppler transducer was connected to a console (FloWire/FloMap System, Volcano Therapeutics, Rancho Cordova, California, USA). The system insonated at a depth of 5.2 mm and used a 128 point fast Fourier transform to measure the signal intensity. The pulse repetition frequency was set at 100 Hz. The detection threshold for Doppler signals was adjusted to a low intensity and a fast sweep speed (display duration 1.6 seconds) was chosen for the Doppler velocity spectrum.
An experimental open loop system was made of a polyethylene tube with an internal diameter of 3 mm. A flow pattern similar to that in a human coronary artery was obtained by a roller pump (fig 2). We positioned a 0.014 inch guidewire with a pulsed Doppler ultrasound transducer mounted on its tip in the flow circuit. The 28° ultrasound beam provided a sample volume that was 4 mm from the tip. The sample volume encompassed the central axis of the tube where the velocity should peak. The large sample volume, combined with the FloMap’s automatic tracking of the average peak velocity (APV), made the FloWire less position dependent.
The circuit was filled with a starch solution to obtain a blood-like pulsatile flow signal. Sand particles with a mean size of 300 μm (range 100–500 μm) were stirred continuously with the starch solution and randomly released into the circuit. Thus, it was unlikely that an excessive particle load together would result in a lower incidence of particle detection.
The particles were filtered after passing the guidewire and counted under a microscope. The Doppler velocity spectrum was recorded on Super VHS tape and analysed off line for HITS (fig 3A). In another experiment we filled the circuit with water instead of a starch solution. Two different preparations of starch particles were used with a mean particle size of 52 μm (range 17–70 μm; Sephadex G-25 Superfine, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and 200 μm (range 100–300 μm; Sephadex G-50 Medium, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). About 10 particles were injected into the circuit and passed the guidewire. The Doppler velocity spectrum was recorded on Super VHS tape and analysed off line for HITS detection. We also analysed HITS for a possible relation between relative Doppler intensity and particle size. The Doppler intensity was measured by wavelet analysis of ultrasound signals.
Simulation of balloon deflation
A second experiment without sand particles was done in the circuit as described above. A balloon catheter with a diameter of 3 mm was advanced 1–2 cm proximal to the guidewire. While Doppler recordings were taken on Super VHS tape, balloon deflations were repeated 30 times. Afterwards the tape was analysed for HITS (fig 3B).
Thirty two consecutive patients (mean (SD) age 61 (11) years; 23 men, nine women) were prospectively studied. They had coronary artery disease and were treated successfully with balloon dilatation, stent implantation, or both for a single vessel stenosis and underwent periprocedural Doppler analysis at the University Clinic of Jena. The institutional ethics committee approved the study protocol and all patients gave written informed consent. The investigation conformed with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Inclusion criteria were age between 18–80 years and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were increase of cardiac markers before PCI; acute myocardial infarction during the four weeks before PCI; terminal renal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, or skeletal muscle injury; chronic occlusion, bifurcation lesion, or in-stent restenosis; multivessel intervention; side branch occlusion or prolonged vasospasm; contraindication for antiplatelet medications; and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists.
All patients received 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid once daily before the procedure and thereafter. A heparin bolus of 10 000 U was given after insertion of the arterial sheath. All patients received 300 mg clopidogrel on the day of PCI. Afterwards they received 75 mg clopidogrel once daily for four weeks. All other medication was given at the discretion of the attending cardiologist.
All patients were monitored for 24 hours after PCI. Cardiac troponin I (upper limit of normal 0.1 ng/ml) and CK (upper limit of normal for women 1.17 μmol/l/s or 70.2 U/l and for men 1.33 μmol/l/s or 79.8 U/l) were assessed between 12–24 hours.
Measurement of intracoronary Doppler velocity
The Doppler transducer was set to the same parameters as described above for the in vitro studies. A fast sweep speed (display duration 1.6 seconds) for the Doppler velocity spectrum was chosen and the detection threshold for Doppler signals was set on a low intensity for all patients in this study. Coronary flow velocity after PCI increased due to hyperaemia. Accordingly, we adjusted the Doppler velocity range spectrum to the expected maximum velocity.
Before and during PCI the Doppler wire was positioned 1–2 cm distal to the stenosis. At this position the APV was recorded. Before and after each interventional step the CFVR was measured as the ratio of maximum APV to baseline APV. Maximum hyperaemia was induced by intracoronary injection of 30–40 μg adenosine. The Doppler recording on Super VHS tape during and three minutes after each PCI was analysed off line for HITS.
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement
To assess intraobserver agreement one of the observers counted HITS twice on different days. Interobserver agreement was assessed by two observers analysing the Doppler recordings for HITS. All patients were assessed.
Data were expressed as mean (SD). Differences of parameters within a group were evaluated by the paired samples t test. The independent samples t test was used to compare means for two groups. HITS counted in the in vitro studies were compared and intraobserver and interobserver agreement was analysed according to the method of Bland and Altman (plot of difference against mean) and by use of a linear regression analysis expressed as the slope and the correlation coefficient.21 All probability values were calculated two sided and a probability level of p < 0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were done with SPSS for Windows version 11.5.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Validation of HITS
In the artificial coronary circulation model, 3884 (90.4%) of the 4296 sand particles were correctly detected as emboli and 412 (9.6%) were not detected. Of the 3905 HITS, 3884 (99.5%) corresponded to particles and 21 (0.5%) did not correspond. The detection sensitivity of emboli as HITS was 90%. We found a close linear correlation between particle count and number of HITS in 29 individual experiments (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) (fig 4).
We were able to identify Sephadex particles with a mean size of 52 μm as HITS. There was no significant correlation between relative Doppler intensity and particle size.
Possible excavations or air bubbles occurring during rapid balloon expansions were simulated by repeated in vitro balloon deflations. We did not detect any HITS during 30 balloon deflations.
Balloon dilatation followed by stent implantation for a single vessel stenosis was performed in 27 patients and balloon dilatation alone was done in five patients. Table 1 summarises patient characteristics, the target vessel size, and the results of intracoronary Doppler and CFVR studies. Balloons used for dilatation were significantly smaller than those used for stenting (2.82 (.46) mm v 3.19 (.41) mm, p < 0.001).
Intracoronary Doppler recordings of HITS
We detected HITS during PCI after 19 (59%) of 32 balloon inflations and in 24 (89%) of 27 patients after stent implantation. Considering only HITS counts > 2 as indicators of microembolisation, such incidences were observed in 38% after balloon deflation and in 82% after stenting. The number of HITS after stent implantation was significantly higher than after balloon dilatation (11 (7) v 2 (4), p < 0.001) (table 1). Almost all HITS were observed within 10 seconds after each PCI immediately after balloon deflation. The last HITS occurred about 60 seconds after PCI, but there were too few of these HITS monitored after balloon dilatation and stenting to detect a significant difference.
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of intracoronary HITS detection
Correlation between HITS counted on different days by one observer was very high (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) (fig 5A) indicating excellent reproducibility for intracoronary Doppler derived HITS. We found a very high correlation coefficient for HITS after balloon dilatation (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and stent implantation (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). The mean difference of HITS data showed good agreement between the two counts (mean difference −0.13 (0.43), SD (1.19) (95% confidence interval)) (fig 5B).
Interobserver agreement of HITS count between two blinded observers was good (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) (fig 5C). The correlation coefficients for HITS after balloon dilatation (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) and after stenting (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) were high. The mean difference of HITS data showed good agreement between the two measurements (mean difference 2.09 (1.69), SD (4.69), (95% confidence interval)) (fig 5D).
Comparison of postprocedural CFVR and number of HITS
In patients with CFVR < 2.0 baseline APV was significantly higher after PCI than in patients with CFVR ⩾ 2.0 (38.7 (14.9) cm/s v 24.2 (9.5) cm/s, p = 0.005) (table 2). The number of HITS did not differ significantly between patients with CFVR < 2.0 and patients with CFVR ⩾ 2.0 after balloon dilatation (1 (1) v 3 (4), not significant) or stent implantation (12 (8) v 10 (7), not significant) (fig 6).
Postprocedural CFVR was < 2.0 in 55% of all patients after balloon dilatation and in 23% after stent implantation. Table 1 shows that patients 3, 10, 20, and 27 had a reduction in CFVR from balloon dilatation to stent implantation. These seem to be the ideal cases to show the presence of distal embolisation, since no other explanations would clarify why, with a restored lumen patency, CFVR decreased. In fact, three of these patients had a greater than average number (> 11) of HITS and patient 10 had the highest number (23) of HITS recorded during the first post-stenting assessment. Eleven patients with no improvement of CFVR after stenting compared with balloon angioplasty or who did not reach a CFVR > 2.0 after stenting tended to have more HITS than did 15 patients with an increased CFVR after stenting (13.7 (6.1) v 9.0 (6.9), p = 0.08).
Comparison of number of HITS and cardiac markers
Overall, the incidence of a rise in cardiac troponin I to more than twice the upper limit of normal was 18.8%. None of the patients experienced a CK increase to more than twice the upper limit of normal. We did not find a significant difference in the number of HITS between patients with and patients without a cardiac troponin I increase to more than twice the upper limit of normal (10 (9) v 12 (9), not significant).
We have shown in this study for the first time that a commercially available intracoronary Doppler ultrasound device can be used to detect HITS in the coronary circulation. This promises to be a novel approach to evaluate the incidence of coronary microembolisation during coronary interventions.
Detection of HITS by intracoronary Doppler ultrasound
The high sensitivity of Doppler ultrasound in detecting emboli is shown by the ability to detect particles in the in vitro experimental setup of approximate diameters between 52–300 μm. The emboli found in patients after sudden cardiac death after PCI or thrombolytic administration had an average size of 250 μm.22 Therefore, the intracoronary Doppler would be able to detect emboli of a size sufficient to block small to medium sized intramural coronary artery branches in vivo.
In the cerebrovascular circulation the sensitivity for detecting HITS is similar to our findings.15 The smallest emboli that were assessed experimentally were 200 to 400 μm in diameter.15 The minimum detection limit of the transcranial Doppler is unknown.13 In contrast to transcranial Doppler the high frequency transducer of the intracoronary Doppler provides a higher resolution at the cost of a reduced depth of penetration. Therefore, we were able to identify particles with a mean size of 52 μm as HITS.
We did not use the algorithm applied for intracerebral HITS detection, as we cannot assess the particles at different distances from the ultrasound sensor. Therefore, the differentiation of HITS from artefacts requires clearly defined criteria. These criteria were easily applicable in both the in vitro and in vivo studies. Usually the amplitude of a Doppler microembolic signal is at least 3 dB higher than that of the background flow signal.19 We did not use an intensity cut off for HITS detection, which is frequently applied in the cerebral circulation.23 In this first application of HITS detection in the coronary circulation we were interested in the complete intensity spectrum, as we did not yet know what signals to expect during a PCI. Therefore, Doppler speckle may have been mistaken for rare HITS at low frequencies in our study, but the good interobserver agreement suggests a good reproducibility.13
HITS during coronary interventions
We observed a significantly higher number of HITS after stent implantation than after balloon dilatation. After deflation of the predilatation balloon we observed HITS in only one third of lesions, whereas after deflation of the stent balloon after stent placement we observed HITS in about 82%, and in most cases a considerable number. This can be explained by the different mechanisms of balloon angioplasty and stenting. Balloon angioplasty enlarges the lumen by local dissection, whereas stenting works through plaque compression.24 Stone et al8 found an enzyme increase after stenting more often than after balloon dilatation alone, and they assumed that this was caused by microembolisation. Also, the smaller balloon sizes for pre-dilatation before stenting must be taken into account for the lower incidence of HITS with balloon dilatation.
Herrmann et al25 reported an association between a periprocedural enzyme rise and a reduced CFVR after stenting in patients with stable angina pectoris. They assumed that microembolisation probably reduced the CFVR. The high incidence of an impaired CFVR was caused by an increased baseline APV after PCI. These findings were similar to those of our study. Herrmann et al25 related the increase in baseline APV to minor forms of embolic myocardial injury. We observed a trend of a higher incidence of HITS immediately after stenting in patients who did not have improved CFVR than after balloon angioplasty, during which in general the incidence of HITS was much lower. A negative impact of microembolisation on CFVR after stenting would probably be counterbalanced by a greater luminal cross section after stent placement than after balloon angioplasty.26
We did not, however, observe a close relation between the incidence of HITS and a cardiac marker enzyme increase. The extent of myocyte damage may be related not to the number but to the size of emboli. It is also conceivable that many patients experience microembolisation but do not go on to myonecrosis either because the embolic burden is small or because adaptive responses accommodate the process.10
The discrepancy and lack of close correlation between enzymatic detection of myocardial damage and microembolisation was also observed during rotablation. This interventional method has a known incidence of peripheral embolisation, but intraprocedural perfusion defects were detected despite a lack of enzymatic evidence of myocardial necrosis.27 There is further evidence that the incidence of emboli and obstruction of peripheral arterioles alone may not determine a clinically adverse response. Experimental studies have shown that coronary microembolisation induced a progressive reduction in regional function without a measurable decrease in regional flow, but that it was associated with an inflammatory response.28,29 The individual response to embolic events in the coronary system may decide whether the regularly observed microembolisation during a PCI leads to a clinical consequence.
The size and composition of an individual embolus cannot be derived from its signal intensity in the Doppler spectrum.13 The size of a single embolus may, however, determine its clinical consequences. The method of detecting HITS also cannot differentiate between air bubbles and solid materials. In the experimental setting, however, for simulation of excavations we did not find HITS after repeated balloon deflations. In a recently conducted clinical study, the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban reversibly suppressed HITS at full dosage in the cerebrovascular circulation. These findings suggest that emboli of arterial origin are solid.30 Therefore, we conclude that air embolism during PCI is unlikely to account for HITS in our study.
Despite the evidence that we can detect microemboli with this new intracoronary approach, there was no close relation between clinical events and the number of HITS. We had included patients with stable angina to allow a standardised experimental protocol and enough time for Doppler registration during this first application of the new method. Future studies will require a larger number of patients in higher risk populations to examine a possible closer relation between HITS and clinical end points.
The detection of coronary emboli during PCI with an intracoronary Doppler ultrasound device is feasible. Coronary microembolism is often induced during PCI, especially after stent implantation. Even though no correlation was found between HITS and CFVR or cardiac marker enzyme increase after PCI, the number of HITS can serve as an indicator to discriminate procedures with different embolic risks. HITS detection may be useful in the evaluation of treatment modalities for the reduction of peri-interventional microembolism in high risk patients.