Responses

Download PDFPDF
Risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention: let’s do it!
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention: we've done it!
    • Antony D Grayson, Clinical Information Analyst
    • Other Contributors:
      • Mark Jackson, and Rodney H. Stables

    Dear Editor,

    We read with interest the recent editorial by Siotia and Gunn [1] which emphasised the need and growing enthusiasm for risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This editorial focuses on the recent publication by Wu and colleagues from New York of a risk model to predict in-hospital mortality following PCI [2]. This particular risk model was based on 46,090 patients undergoing PCI between 2...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.