Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Urotensin II is raised in children with congenital heart disease
  1. C M Simpson,
  2. D J Penny*,
  3. C F Stocker,
  4. L S Shekerdemian
  1. The Australia and New Zealand Children’s Heart Research Centre, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Lara Shekerdemian
    Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; lara.shekerdemian{at}rch.org.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Urotensin II (U-II) is a vasoactive peptide that has been highly conserved throughout evolution. U-II has been described as the most potent vasoconstrictor yet identified.1 The identification in humans of immune reactive U-II in plasma, the U-II receptor, and U-II expression in the myocardium, arterial system, and kidney and the elevation of U-II in important disease states such as hypertension and congestive heart failure suggest that U-II may be an important mediator in the regulation of cardiovascular function.1–4

U-II has never been investigated in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and in those undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The objective of this study was twofold. Firstly, we compared plasma U-II in children with CHD with concentrations in healthy children; and secondly, we examined the 24 hour profile of U-II in children undergoing open heart surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty children undergoing surgery for CHD were recruited, of whom 20 had low or normal preoperative pulmonary blood flow (LNF group; undergoing valve repairs, relief of outflow tract obstruction, tetralogy of Fallot repair, Fontan operations, and arterial switch operation) and 20 had high preoperative pulmonary blood flow (HF group; undergoing closure of septal defects). In the HF patients, preoperative angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were being taken by five children, diuretics by seven, and digoxin by one child. Seventeen of the children with CHD underwent modified ultrafiltration (MUF) after CPB, according to institutional protocols. Twenty children without cardiopulmonary or renal disease who were undergoing day case surgical procedures were also recruited for the study (controls).

In controls, a single blood sample was taken after induction of anaesthesia. In …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • * Also the Department of Cardiology, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

  • Also the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

    Financial support: Dr C Simpson is supported by a postgraduate medical research scholarship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

  • Competing interests: None declared

  • Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethics in Humans Research Committee of The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. EHRC No 24013A; approved 1 April 2004.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.