Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Importance of concordance between left ventricular pacing sites and latest activated regions: myth or reality?
  1. C Leclercq
  1. Professor C Leclercq, Département de Cardiologie et Maladies Vasculaires, Centre Cardio-Pneumologique, Hôpital Pontchaillou, rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033 Rennes Cedex 09, France; christophe.leclercq{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

See article on page 1197

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a well-established treatment in patients with severe and drug-refractory heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV) with severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, dilated left ventricle and, lastly, LV dyssynchrony defined by a QRS duration ⩾120 ms on surface ECG.1 2 In patients selected on the basis of these criteria, CRT significantly improves symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life and also reduces morbidity and mortality.36 Despite a better comprehension of the physiopathology of cardiac dyssynchrony and technical improvements, especially in LV lead positioning in the tributary veins of the coronary sinus, a non-acceptable and stable rate of “non-responders” remains the Achilles’ heel of CRT. However, the real rate of non-responders remains difficult to evaluate, particularly because of the heterogeneity of definitions of non-responders. In the MIRACLE trial, the rate of non-responders defined by a composite definition including death, worsening of heart failure or of global assessment and discontinuation of treatment and lack of improvement in NYHA class was 30%.4 The rate of responders defined as patients alive with stable or improved NYHA class without increase in diuretic use in the latest published trial, the CARE-HF study, was 64%.6 7 There are several reasons to explain the lack of efficacy of CRT in patients who are non-responders:

  • An inappropriate or non-optimal selection of the patients on the basis of electrical criterion only (QRS width ⩾120 ms on 12-lead surface ECG) as a marker of cardiac dyssynchrony. Previous echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that there is not always a strong correlation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchronies, suggesting that patients with a wide QRS might not have mechanical dyssynchrony within the left ventricle and that by contrast a significant …

View Full Text


  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Abbreviations:
    cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    left ventricular
    New York Heart Association

Linked Articles