Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on “stenoses”?
  1. Christof Burgstahler,
  2. Stephen Schroeder
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
  1. Dr C Burgstahler, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; christof.burgstahler{at}


See article on page 1381

  • coronary angiography
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • multisclice computed tomography
  • non-invasive
  • stress perfusion

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Abbreviations:
    multisclice computed tomography
    magnetic resonance imaging

Linked Articles