You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 93, Issue 11
  • Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on “stenoses”?

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on “stenoses”?
  1. Christof Burgstahler,
  2. Stephen Schroeder
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
  1. Dr C Burgstahler, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; christof.burgstahler{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de

Abstract

See article on page 1381

  • coronary angiography
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • multisclice computed tomography
  • non-invasive
  • stress perfusion

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.113910

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Conflict of interest: None declared.

    • Abbreviations:
      MSCT
      multisclice computed tomography
      MRI
      magnetic resonance imaging

    Linked Articles