Download PDFPDF
Explaining trends in coronary heart disease hospitalisations in New Zealand: trend for admissions and incidence can be in opposite directions
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Explaining coronary heart disease trends in New Zealand
    • Tom G Briffa, Researcher
    • Other Contributors:
      • Lee Nedkoff, Joseph Hung, Michael Hobbs

    As suggested in your editorial comment (1), the divergent trends in incident (falling) and recurrent (rising) myocardial infarction (MI) in New Zealand described by Chan and colleagues are puzzling.(2) We believe that this finding could well be an artifact resulting from the way in which they have defined incident MI. In their paper, incident admissions for MI are described as those having no admission for ANY form o...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.