Download PDFPDF
Acute coronary syndromes
Predicting freedom from clinical events in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    ACS Scores: Risky business?
    • Richard Lim, Associate Professor / Consultant Cardiologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Gregory Starmer

    To the Editor:

    If a study identifies several predictors of high risk of adverse events - as GRACE has attempted to do for ACS, could we dare presume that the absence of those predictors might perhaps indicate low risk i.e. freedom from those events? Have we somehow missed the point of this paper by Brieger et al? Or are there more analyses just waiting to be presented from a different angle to further advance o...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    • Chris P. Gale, Academic Clnical Lecturer in Cardiology
    • Other Contributors:
      • Brian Cattle, Alex Simms, Darren Greenwood, and Robert West

    To the editor. We read with interest the paper presented by Breiger et al [1] and feel that it is most worthy of comment. The authors describe the development and internal validation of a risk score for patients with NSTEACS, from a global registry, that predicts in-patient freedom-from- events. They present an alternative concept to ACS risk characterisation – rather than the identification of high-risk subjects who merit...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.