Download PDFPDF
Acute coronary syndromes
Predicting freedom from clinical events in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    ACS Scores: Risky business?
    • Richard Lim, Associate Professor / Consultant Cardiologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Gregory Starmer

    To the Editor:

    If a study identifies several predictors of high risk of adverse events - as GRACE has attempted to do for ACS, could we dare presume that the absence of those predictors might perhaps indicate low risk i.e. freedom from those events? Have we somehow missed the point of this paper by Brieger et al? Or are there more analyses just waiting to be presented from a different angle to further advance o...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    • Chris P. Gale, Academic Clnical Lecturer in Cardiology
    • Other Contributors:
      • Brian Cattle, Alex Simms, Darren Greenwood, and Robert West

    To the editor. We read with interest the paper presented by Breiger et al [1] and feel that it is most worthy of comment. The authors describe the development and internal validation of a risk score for patients with NSTEACS, from a global registry, that predicts in-patient freedom-from- events. They present an alternative concept to ACS risk characterisation – rather than the identification of high-risk subjects who merit...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.