You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Featured correspondence
Letters
The authors’ reply:
  1. D Brieger1,
  2. G FitzGerald2,
  3. K A A Fox3,
  4. K A Eagle4,
  5. A Budaj5,
  6. Á Avezum6,
  7. B Costa1,
  8. C B Granger7,
  9. F A Anderson2,
  10. Ph G Steg8
  1. 1
    Coronary Care Unit, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia
  2. 2
    Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
  3. 3
    Cardiovascular Research, Division of Medical and Radiological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
  4. 4
    University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  5. 5
    Postgraduate Medical School, Department of Cardiology, Grochowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
  6. 6
    Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil
  7. 7
    Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  8. 8
    Département de Cardiologie, INSERM U-698, Université Paris 7, AP-HP, Paris, France
  1. Dr D Brieger, Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Hospital Rd, Concord Sydney, Australia 2139; davidb{at}email.cs.nsw.gov.au

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.171959

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    These authors have highlighted one of the attractions of our score: that it derives from clinical and biochemical parameters available soon after admission. We developed our score in patients with a discharge diagnosis of either unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction primarily because we wished to provide a tool of unambiguous clinical applicability. Patients presenting with ST elevation are at high risk of a short-term event and were not …

    View Full Text

    Linked Articles