You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Featured correspondence
The Authors' reply
  1. S L Hetherington,
  2. Z Adam,
  3. M A de Belder,
  4. J A Hall,
  5. D F Muir,
  6. A G C Sutton,
  7. N Swanson,
  8. R A Wright
  1. Department of Cardiology, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Simon L Hetherington, Department of Cardiology, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK; simon.hetherington{at}nuth.nhs.uk

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.196063

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The Authors' reply: We support Dr Cortese's enthusiasm for radial artery access for PCI.1 The main purpose of our observational study2 was to confirm the feasibility and safety of access via the radial artery in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Linked articles 196055

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • PostScript
      Radial force
      B Cortese
      Heart 2010; 96 1167-1167 Published Online First: 18 May 2010. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.196055