Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cardiovascular highlights from non-cardiology journals
  1. C Lindsay Alistair, Editor

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Cardiovascular imaging

CACS improves cardiovascular risk prediction

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring (CACS) can be used to predict the likelihood of future cardiovascular events. However, whether this provides extra information on top of traditional cardiovascular risk factors remains unclear.

In this study, 6814 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) underwent CACS and were then followed up for 5 years. None of the participants were known to have cardiovascular disease, but patients with diabetes were excluded from the primary analysis. The authors used two predictive models; the first contained the traditional cardiovascular risk factors of age, sex, tobacco use, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive use, total and HDL cholesterol and race/ethnicity. The second used all of these factors and in addition CACS. The authors calculated the net reclassification improvement and compared the distribution of risk using both models.

Median follow-up was 5.8 years, during which 209 coronary heart disease (CHD) events occurred, of which were 122 myocardial infarctions, death from CHD, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The use of CACS resulted in significant improvements in risk prediction compared with the use of traditional risk factors alone (net reclassification benefit 0.25, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.34; p<0.001). A larger number of patients were classified either in the very high risk or the very low risk category using CACS (77% vs 69%). Of note, …

View Full Text


  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.