Responses

Download PDFPDF
Early management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    GRACE risk recommendations in NICE GC94 are not appropriate

    To the Editor,

    The article by Gray et al is a succinct and useful summary of NICE clinical guidance 94 on the management of unstable angina and non ST elevation myocardial infarction (1). The NICE document is itself a major piece of work which synthesises vast bodies of evidence (2). The majority of the document and the resulting summary to which we respond are to be applauded. However, we believe the risk stra...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.