Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Assessment of vascular phenotype using a novel very-high-resolution ultrasound technique in adolescents after aortic coarctation repair and/or stent implantation: relationship to central haemodynamics and left ventricular mass
  1. Taisto Sarkola1,2,
  2. Andrew N Redington1,3,
  3. Cameron Slorach1,
  4. Wei Hui1,
  5. Timothy Bradley1,
  6. Edgar Jaeggi1,3
  1. 1Labatt Family Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2Children's Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Research Institute, Physiology & Experimental Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Edgar Jaeggi, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada; edgar.jaeggi{at}


Objectives Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) has been associated with abnormal vascular function, increased blood pressure (BP) and premature cardiovascular disease even after a successful intervention. The objective was to determine the severity of residual cardiovascular abnormalities in youths after CoA repair and their relation to regional BP.

Design Cross-sectional study in tertiary healthcare setting.

Methods Thirty-six youths with CoA (age 16±1 years; neonatal surgery only: n=16; surgery and/or stent implantation: n=20) and 37 age-matched controls were prospectively examined using a very-high-resolution vascular ultrasound imaging, echocardiography and applanation tonometry.

Results CoA was associated with increased right arm systolic BP (p<0.001), intima–media thickness (IMT) in the common carotid (p<0.001), right brachial (p<0.05) and radial (p<0.05) arteries and ascending aortic stiffness (p<0.05). Carotid IMT correlated positively with age at first intervention (r=0.36, p<0.05). With left subclavian flap-type repair, left-arm systolic BP (p<0.001) and left brachial (p<0.001), radial (p<0.001) and ulnar (p<0.05) arterial IMTs were all reduced. When adjusted for BP, body mass index, age and gender, only carotid IMT (p<0.001) and left ventricular mass (p=0.013) of stented patients, as well as left-arm arterial IMTs (p<0.01) in subclavian flap-type repair patients, remained different from the controls. The significant associations of the stented patients disappeared after the adjustment for later patient age at intervention (median 8.7 vs 0.03 years, p<0.001). Residual arm–leg BP gradients correlated positively with carotid and brachial IMT. No differences between the CoA patients and the controls were found for arterial adventitial thicknesses, lumen dimensions, thigh systolic BP, abdominal aorta and carotid stiffness and right carotid to radial pulse wave velocity.

Conclusion CoA repair in early childhood is associated with increased preductal arterial IMT, left ventricular mass and ascending aortic stiffness in adolescents. The more pronounced cardiovascular abnormalities after CoA stent implantation are likely related to older patient age at the time of intervention.

  • Coarctation of aorta
  • hypertension
  • arterial wall morphology
  • ventricular mass
  • intima–media thickness
  • paediatric cardiology

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding The study was supported by grants from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Instrumentarium Foundation, Societatis Medicorum Fennicae, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and the Stockmann Foundation. The 25 and 35 MHz probes were loaned to the investigators by Visualsonics (Toronto, Canada). The company had no other role in the study.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto) and Health Canada.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.