Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Featured correspondence
The dangers of mandating policy in the absence of clear evidence
  1. Morton Satin
  1. Correspondence to Morton Satin, Salt Institute, 700 N Fairfax St., Alexandria, VA 22314, USA; morton{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

To the Editor It is quite incredible how far the notion of a population-wide benefit accruing from salt reduction has gone in view of the contradictory clinical evidence. In the first instance we know that the population response to salt reduction is rather limited (2–6 mm Hg) and heterogeneous, with 30% experiencing a small drop in blood pressure (BP), ∼20% experiencing an increase in BP and the residual 50% of the population undergoing no impact at all.1

Indeed, the most recent evidence seems to indicate that so-called salt sensitivity on either side of the response is due to a genetically based imbalance of aldosterone production. Those with abnormally high production of aldosterone show a slight reduction in BP with decreased salt intake,2 while abnormally low aldosterone levels may …

View Full Text


  • Linked articles 217802.

  • Competing interests The author is employed by the Salt Institute.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Linda J Cobiac Theo Vos Lennert Veerman