Background Cardiac disease related to transfusional iron overload is the leading cause of death in patients with β-thalassaemia major. Early myocardial iron deposition predates decreased left ventricular dysfunction and currently is best assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.
Methods Echocardiographic speckle tracking-derived myocardial mechanics were compared with cardiac MRI T2 star (T2*) calculations in 45 chronically transfused patients with β-thalassaemia major or Diamond–Blackfan anaemia (26 retrospectively and an additional 19 for validation). Two groups were studied: patients with presumed cardiac iron overload and interventricular T2* value ≤20 ms (low T2*) and patients with >20 ms (normal T2*). They were compared with a normal control group of 18 age- and gender-matched patients.
Results Patients with low T2* had a uniform decrease in longitudinal and circumferential strain compared with normal controls (−16±3% vs −20±3% and −20±4% vs −23±5%, respectively; p<0.0005). Peak twist and peak apical rotation were lower in patients with low T2* than in those with normal T2* or normal control patients. Conversely, no significant difference was observed between patients with normal T2* and controls. There was a strong and direct logarithmic correlation between average global longitudinal strain and T2* values (r=−0.68, p=0.0007). Using a cut-off of ≤−17%, global longitudinal strain predicted a T2* value of <20 ms with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 88%.
Conclusion Myocardial mechanics offers a simple alternative to cardiac MRI for assessing significant myocardial iron deposition.
- myocardial mechanics
- cardiac magnetic resonance
- speckle tracking
- diastolic dysfunction
- tissue doppler
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the hospital research and ethics board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.