Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The Authors' reply
  1. Arun Dahiya1,2,
  2. William Vollbon1,
  3. Christine Jellis1,3,
  4. David Prior3,
  5. Sudhir Wahi1,2,
  6. Thomas Marwick1,2,4
  1. 1School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  2. 2Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  3. 3St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  1. Correspondence to Thomas H Marwick, Cleveland Clinic, Section Head—CV Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; marwict{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The Authors' reply We thank Magnino and colleagues1 for their interest in our paper2 and appreciate their comments. Their three concerns relate to the assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure, the calculation of right atrial pressure (RAP) and the choice of selection of the original estimation (echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVRe))3 versus our proposed corrected estimation (PVRc).

Although imperfect, E/e′ is one of the best available non-invasive tissue Doppler-based parameters for estimating LV filling …

View Full Text


  • Linked articles 223735.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles