You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Electronic page
Editorial
Statement on matching language to the type of evidence used in describing outcomes data
  1. Heart Group Editors
  1. Department of Cardiology, London Chest Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Adam Timmis, Department of Cardiology, London Chest Hospital, London E2 9JX, UK; adamtimmis{at}mac.com

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303287

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Editors of the HEART Group Journals

    There are many different types of studies that can be conducted to provide evidence for clinical and outcomes research, including but not limited to retrospective observational analyses, case-control studies and randomised controlled trials. Each of these analyses has strengths and limitations, but most importantly, they all result in different types …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding None.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.