You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Images in cardiology
Percutaneous valve-in-valve implantations: importance of knowing the effective internal diameter of bioprosthetic valves
  1. A B Gopalamurugan,
  2. Markus Reinthaler,
  3. Michael J Mullen
  1. Department for Structural Interventions, The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to A B Gopalamurugan, Department for Structural Interventions, The Heart Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1M 8PH, UK; gopalamurugan{at}yahoo.com

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304274

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation with the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) technology has been used to treat dysfunctional bioprosthetic valves. A factor that determines a patient's suitability is the valve size of the previously implanted bioprosthetic valve. A 64-year-old lady with previous tricuspid valve replacement (33 mm stented tissue valve, model: ESP100-33M-00 Epic, St Jude Medical, Minnesota, USA), was referred for treatment of her dysfunctional tricuspid valve due to severe …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All the authors in this article contributed on the following: (1) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (2) final approval of the version to be published.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.