Statistics from Altmetric.com
Acute coronary syndromes
Acute chest pain remains one of the most difficult challenges for the clinician. Nowadays, chest pain and its related complaints account for up to 10% of the adult emergency admissions and around 25% of all hospital admissions.w1 Notably, the number of patients presenting with complaints of chest pain is rising.w2 In a typical population of patients presented for the evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency departments, about 20% will have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).w3 w4 The principal pathophysiological mechanism of an ACS is one of myocardial underperfusion resulting from either atherosclerotic plaque rupture or from erosion with different degrees of superimposed thrombus.1 ,2 A minority of patients, estimated to be around 10% of those who presented with chest pain, will not have an ACS but another life threatening problem such as a pulmonary embolism or an acute aortic dissection.w1 Most patients are discharged with the diagnosis of a non-cardiac condition. These non-cardiac conditions include musculoskeletal syndromes, gastrointestinal syndromes, and psychological disorders.
When evaluating cardiac chest pain, an ECG provides the initial classification. Patients are subdivided into those with a persistent ST segment elevation and those without a persistent ST segment elevation. The latter is called a non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). The concentration of the biomarkers of necrosis above a certain prespecified threshold differentiates NSTE-ACS patients into those with a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as opposed to those with unstable angina (Ofigure 1). This article focuses on the timing of invasive evaluation in those patients with a suspected NSTE-ACS.
Evaluate the probability of an ACS
In patients presenting with a suspected NSTE-ACS, the first hurdle is to confirm …
Contributors Both authors participated in the literature search and the writing of the article. Both authors gave approval to the final version to be published.
Competing interests In compliance with EBAC/EACCME guidelines, all authors participating in Education in Heart have disclosed potential conflict of interest that might cause a bias in the article. The authors have no competing interests.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.