Article Text


  1. B N Modi1,
  2. D A Jones1,
  3. K S Rathod1,
  4. M Akhtar1,
  5. A K Jain1,
  6. S Singh Kalra2,
  7. T Crake3,
  8. P Meier3,
  9. Z Astroulakis4,
  10. C Dollery3,
  11. M Ozkur3,
  12. R Rakhit5,
  13. C J Knight1,
  14. M C Dalby6,
  15. I S Malik7,
  16. N Bunce4,
  17. P Lim4,
  18. G Virdi8,
  19. M Whitbread8,
  20. R Weerackody1,
  21. A Mathur1,
  22. S Redwood9,
  23. P A MacCarthy2,
  24. A Wragg1
  1. 1 Barts Health NHS Trust
  2. 2 Kings College Hospital
  3. 3 Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals
  4. 4 St Georges Hospital
  5. 5 Royal Free London NHS Trust
  6. 6 Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
  7. 7 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  8. 8 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
  9. 9 Guys and St Thomas' Hospital


    Introduction During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) post ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), distal embolisation of thrombus may lead to failure to re-establish normal flow in the infarct-related artery. Manual thrombus aspiration has been shown to improve coronary perfusion as assessed by time to ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush grade. Evidence supporting the benefit of thrombus aspiration on clinical outcomes, however, is limited and inconsistent. We aimed to assess the impact of manual thrombectomy on mortality in patients presenting with STEMI across all PPCI centres in London over a 5 year period from 2007 until 2012.

    Table 1

    Methods This was an observational cohort study of 9935 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PPCI between 2007 and 2012 at eight tertiary cardiac centres across London, UK. Patient's details were recorded at the time of the procedure into the British Cardiac Intervention Society (BCIS) database. Outcome was assessed by all-cause mortality. Anonymous datasets from the eight centres were merged for analysis. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 2.0 years (IQR range 1.1–3.1 years).

    Results Of the 9935 consecutive STEMI patients presenting for PPCI, 2859 had mechanical thrombectomy. Patients who had manual thrombectomy were significantly younger (average age 60.6 vs 62.9) and were less likely to have had a previous myocardial infarction (11.9% of thrombectomy patients vs 14.7% of non-thrombectomy patients). Patients receiving manual thromectomy were found to be significantly more likely to have had PPCI via a radial approach (33.1% in thrombectomy patients vs 19.9% in non-thromectomy patients). Procedural success (defined as TIMI 3 flow at the end of procedure) was found to be significantly more likely in patients receiving manual thrombectomy (89.5% vs 86.7%) (table 1). Patients with thrombectomy use had similar unadjusted all-cause mortality rates to those without thrombectomy use (12.7% vs 16.5%, p=NS) during the 5-year follow-up period (figure 1). After multivariable adjustment thrombectomy use was associated with significantly decreased mortality rates (HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.9, p=0.04).

    Figure 1

    Kaplan-Meier curve showing cumulative probability of all-cause mortality according to thrombectomy use.

    Conclusion Mechanical thrombectomy use appears to be associated with improved outcome, in the form of decreased mortality, in this large observational trial.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.