Jump to comment:

• Correspondence on “Physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with valvular heart disease” by Chatrath et al
  Sahrai Saeed, Ronak Rajani
  Published on: 24 November 2022

• Published on: 24 November 2022

  Correspondence on “Physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with valvular heart disease” by Chatrath et al

  • Sahrai Saeed, Consultant Cardiologist Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Other Contributors:
    • Ronak Rajani, Consultant Cardiologist

  To the Editor We read with interest the review article “Physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with valvular heart disease” by Doctors Nikhil Chatrath and Michael Papadakis, which was published in a recent edition of Heart.1 The focused clinical review is particularly useful for physicians and other health care workers dealing with patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). However, we would like to share some additional thoughts based upon our own experiences from Heart Valve Clinics and our previous publications derived from the EXTAS (exercise testing in aortic stenosis) cohort study.2 Indeed, some notions in their work, were previously explored by us in the EXTAS study and deserve mention. We showed that exercise testing (modified Bruce protocol) was safe, tolerable and revealed symptoms not confirmed on the history in approximately 40% of patients with asymptomatic severe and 24% moderate AS.2 Serial exercise testing added incremental prognostic information to baseline testing. Furthermore, in another follow-up study we showed that an early rapid rise in heart rate (defined as achieving at least 85% of target heart rate or ≥50% increase from baseline within the first 6 min) was associated with revealed symptoms later in the test and an increased risk of death in moderate AS in the following 2 years.3 We speculated that rapid risk in heart rate was probably a compensation for a fall in stroke volume to maintain cardiac output in early exercise whi...

  Show More

  To the Editor We read with interest the review article “Physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with valvular heart disease” by Doctors Nikhil Chatrath and Michael Papadakis, which was published in a recent edition of Heart.1 The focused clinical review is particularly useful for physicians and other health care workers dealing with patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). However, we would like to share some additional thoughts based upon our own experiences from Heart Valve Clinics and our previous publications derived from the EXTAS (exercise testing in aortic stenosis) cohort study.2 Indeed, some notions in their work, were previously explored by us in the EXTAS study and deserve mention. We showed that exercise testing (modified Bruce protocol) was safe, tolerable and revealed symptoms not confirmed on the history in approximately 40% of patients with asymptomatic severe and 24% moderate AS.2 Serial exercise testing added incremental prognostic information to baseline testing. Furthermore, in another follow-up study we showed that an early rapid rise in heart rate (defined as achieving at least 85% of target heart rate or ≥50% increase from baseline within the first 6 min) was associated with revealed symptoms later in the test and an increased risk of death in moderate AS in the following 2 years.3 We speculated that rapid risk in heart rate was probably a compensation for a fall in stroke volume to maintain cardiac output in early exercise which occurs in patients with spontaneous or revealed symptoms. By comparison, in asymptomatic patients the stroke volume rises in early exercise. Hence, a normal HR response to exercise test is clinically useful and reassuring when the presenting symptoms are doubtful. A positive exercise test (revealed symptoms, abnormal blood pressure response, arrhythmias or significant decline in functional capacity) or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction by echocardiography at baseline are guideline indications for valve intervention,4 and in these patients valve intervention rather than exercise prescription is necessary. However, exercise-based rehabilitation or training differs from formal exercise testing, and is useful both before and after valve intervention. Pre-intervention exercise training or exercise-based rehabilitation is associated with better post-intervention outcome, shorter hospital stay,5 and an early return to work or other activities. Pre-intervention obesity is often a concern for surgeons with regard to the potential for post-intervention rehabilitation. However, in daily clinical practice we encounter patients who are turned down for valve intervention (transcatheter valve implantation [TAVI] or conventional surgery) by the Heart team due to complex comorbidity, frailty and higher age, and are therefore assigned for conservative treatment. The question arises whether these patients may benefit from a low-intensity training or regular physical activity or not, and what will be the prescribed exercise intensity and frequency. Exercise-based rehabilitation or training is probably necessary for these patients to maintain and improve their physical function. However, there is a paucity of evidence in the literature to assess the benefit of exercise-based rehabilitation in patients with significant AS who are not found eligible for valve intervention, and hence no dedicated exercise recommendations exist. This should be investigated in prospective research studies in future.
  Furthermore, we agree with the authors that most cardiologists dealing with patients with VHD may have limited knowledge of exercise prescription. However, this should ideally be incorporated into the remit of cardiac rehabilitation teams, which is often comprised of physicians and other health and fitness professionals in most European Hospitals, particularly in Scandinavia. Next, a comparison between aortic regurgitation related pressure and volume overload and the athletic heart was presented. However, a resting echo in athletic heart will exclude aortic regurgitation. Furthermore, in addition to borderline (low-normal) LV ejection fraction in the context of bradycardia, and significant improvement during exercise (contractile reserve), an athletic heart may typically show normal/higher systolic tissue Doppler velocities (S’), global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography and other more sensitive marker of systolic LV function, such as the novel first-phase ejection fraction,6 compared with patients with VHD. Finally, a reduced LV ejection fraction in severe AS may be reversible reflecting “contractility-afterload mismatch”; i.e. reduced transaortic flow or LV ejection fraction but preserved contractile function. A relief of valve resistance (AS) in these patients either by TAVI or surgical valve replacement often leads to immediate increase in LV ejection fraction and/or normalization of transaortic flow.
  Contributors SS wrote the first draft, RR revised it. Both authors approved the final version.
  Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
  Competing interests None declared.
  Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this work.
  Patient consent for publication Not applicable.
  Ethics approval This work does not involve human participants.

  References
  1. Chatrath N, Papadakis M. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with valvular heart disease. Heart 2022 Mar 2:heartjnl-2021-319824.
  2. Saeed S, Rajani R, Seifert R, et al. Exercise testing in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2018 Nov;104(22):1836-1842.
  3. Chambers JB, Rajani R, Parkin D, et al. Rapid early rise in heart rate on treadmill exercise in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a new prognostic marker? Open Heart 2019;6(1):e000950. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000950. eCollection 2019.
  4. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 2739-2791.
  5. Marmelo F, Rocha V, Moreira-Gonçalves D. The impact of prehabilitation on post-surgical complications in patients undergoing non-urgent cardiovascular surgical intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:404–17.
  6. Saeed S, Gu H, Rajani R, et al. First phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis: A useful new measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Clin Ultrasound 2021 Nov;49(9):932-935.

  Show Less

  Conflict of Interest:
  None declared.

  • Back to top