Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Blood pressure management in type 2 diabetes: a review of recent evidence
  1. Malgorzata Wamil1,2,3,
  2. Milad Nazarzadeh1,
  3. Kazem Rahimi1
  1. 1Deep Medicine, Nuffield Department of Reproductive and Women’s Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Cardiology Department, Great Western Hospital NHS Trust, Swindon, UK
  3. 3Cardiology Department, Mayo Clinic Healthcare in London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kazem Rahimi, Deep Medicine, Nuffield Department of Reproductive and Women’s Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK; kazem.rahimi{at}wrh.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The frequent concurrence of elevated blood pressure (BP) and type 2 diabetes markedly elevates the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the role of BP-lowering therapies in preventing cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes and the most appropriate BP treatment target in these individuals. We outline possible reasons for the heterogeneous effect of BP lowering in patients with and without diabetes and consider several pathophysiological mechanisms that could potentially explain such differences. The review introduces a mediation model, delineating the intricate interplay between hypertension and diabetes and their joint contribution to cardiovascular and renal pathologies. Finally, we outline the role of lifestyle changes and other pharmacological options in attenuating cardiometabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes. We propose a comprehensive, patient-centred management strategy, integrating various antihypertensive therapeutic approaches and providing clinicians with a systematic framework for better decision-making.

  • Diabetes
  • Hypertension
  • Meta-Analysis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • X @gosia.wamil, @kazemr

  • Contributors All coauthors contributed to drafting the manuscript and revised the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.