Article Text

Download PDFPDF
High heart rates during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: continuous rhythm monitoring data of the RACE V study
  1. Tim Koldenhof1,2,
  2. Isabelle C Van Gelder2,
  3. Martijn E van de Lande2,
  4. Meelad I H Al-Jazairi2,
  5. Robert G Tieleman1,2,
  6. Michiel Rienstra2
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michiel Rienstra, Department of Cardiology, UMCG, Groningen, Netherlands; m.rienstra{at}umcg.nl

Abstract

Background Preventing high heart rates in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a key objective of AF management. Data regarding heart rates in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) is lacking. This analysis aimed to provide insight into heart rates during PAF episodes measured with continuous implantable loop monitoring.

Methods In present analysis of the Interaction between hyperCoagulability, Electrical remodeling, and Vascular Destabilization in the Progression of AF study, we included 349 patients with at least one year of continuous rhythm monitoring and an episode of AF. Mean heart rates and duration of AF episodes were used to calculate total AF duration and AF duration above different heart rate cut-offs.

Results The median age was 64.0 (58.4 to 70.5) years, 152 (44%) were women and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 or higher in 255 (73%) patients. During 28.3 (21.3 to 35.0) months of follow-up, the median number of AF episodes was 62 (12 to 293) with a median total AF duration of 4.6 (0.8 to 26.8) days. At baseline, 172 (49%) patients used beta-blockers, 64 (18%) used diltiazem or verapamil and 5 (1%) used digoxin. A total of 133 patients (38%) experienced a heart rate >110 bpm for more than 50% of the time during AF. Fifty-six (16%) patients had a heart rate >130 bpm for more than 50% of the time while in AF. During follow-up, 39 patients (11%) received an increase of rate-controlling medication.

Conclusion Continuous rhythm monitoring revealed that more than a third of PAF patients had heart rates above 110 bpm for more than half of their time in AF.

Trial registration number Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02726698.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors TK was involved in the study design, data acquisition, conducted the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. MR and RGT were involved with the study design, data acquisition and interpretation of results and critically reviewed the manuscript. ICVG and MEvdL were involved in the interpretation of the data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version. MR is the guarantor of this manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded from the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: an initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation, CVON 2014-9: Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction between hyperCoagulability, Electrical remodeling, and Vascular Destabilization in the Progression of AF (RACE V). Unrestricted grant support from Medtronic Trading.

  • Competing interests RGT reports grants from Medtronic and Abbott, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer and Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb all outside submitted work. RGT is coinventor of the MyDiagnostick, not receiving royalties for the past 5 years. MDM is a Medtronic employee and WP Coordinator in the H2020 ITN My-Atria (No: 766082). The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.