Article Text
Abstract
Degenerative mitral valve disease is common. Up to a quarter of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease may be asymptomatic despite having severe valve regurgitation. Current guideline indications for intervention in asymptomatic patient are centred on left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction and may include consideration in atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension and those with left atrial dilatation. However, despite intervention according to these recommendations, patients remain at risk of post-operative heart failure and mortality. Newer risk markers have been developed including left ventricular and atrial strain, myocardial fibrosis demonstrated using late gadolinium enhancement, mitral annular disjunction and ventricular arrhythmia burden. Translating newer markers into clinical practice will require integrating and identifying high-risk phenotypes that benefit from early intervention using machine learning techniques and artificial intelligence. Valve repair is the recommended intervention. However, repair rate and durability are dependent on both operator and centre volumes as well as valve characteristics. Recent advancements, including robotic surgery, may enhance repair rates; however, larger datasets are necessary to confirm these improvements. Efforts should focus on establishing high-volume regional centres of excellence for mitral valve repair.
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency
- Heart Valve Diseases
- Treatment Outcome
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @DocStrom, @guyll
Contributors All authors have contributed to the conception of the manuscript and to the drafting and/or the critical revision and editing of this review. SB is the guarantor of this review.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests JBS reports research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL169517) and National Institute of Aging (1R01AG063937), Anumana, Philips Healthcare and Bracco Diagnostics; consulting for Bracco Diagnostics, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips Healthcare, General Electric Healthcare and EVERSANA and is a member of the scientific advisory boards for Ultromics, HeartSciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, and EchoIQ. All remaining authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.