Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Breaking new ground in treatment of coronary calcium
  1. James C Spratt1,
  2. Ganeev Malhotra2
  1. 1Cardiology, St George's, University of London, London, UK
  2. 2Cardiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor James C Spratt; james.spratt{at}nhs.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is standard of care for the treatment of renal calculi. Fracturing large renal calculi using acoustic energy allows them to be safely passed as smaller fragments therefore avoiding surgical treatment. The adaption of ESWL to the vascular space, termed intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), could be said to have a similar goal and has sparked renewed interest in the percutaneous treatment of calcified coronary artery disease (CCAD). The mechanism of action, acoustic waveforms which selectively target calcium, is novel within the vascular space. Yet, crucially, as it is delivered via a balloon platform, it feels familiar.

The prospective DISRUPT-CAD trials established IVL’s safety and efficacy in treating CCAD.1 However, as is typical with trials designed for regulatory approval, these studies were conducted in elective patients with restrictive inclusion criteria. IVL penetrance and use in off-label indications has exponentially increased since the device’s approval. Real-world registries are therefore important to explore the use of IVL within extended use criteria.

This retrospective study by van Oort and colleagues2 included patients from a multicentre IVL registry from seven European centres between 2019 and 2024 and included core lab analysis of angiographic and intracoronary imaging (ICI) data. It provides insights into contemporary IVL utilisation patterns, safety and efficacy.

The findings align with the DISRUPT-CAD data, but crucially extend IVL validation across a broader population, which included higher risk presentations (acute …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • JCS and GM contributed equally.

  • Contributors Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests JCS has provided consultancy services to Shockwave Medical, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular and an institutional research grant from Shockwave Medical.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles