Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Does TCPC power loss really affect exercise capacity?
  1. Reza H Khiabani1,
  2. Kevin K Whitehead2,
  3. David Han1,
  4. Maria Restrepo1,
  5. Elaine Tang1,
  6. James Bethel3,
  7. Stephen M Paridon2,
  8. Mark A Fogel2,
  9. Ajit P Yoganathan1
  1. 1 Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  2. 2 Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3 Westat, Rockville, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ajit P Yoganathan, 387 Technology Circle, Suite 232, Atlanta, GA 30313, USA; ajit.yoganathan{at}bme.gatech.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The Authors’ reply

We read with interest the response1 to our study.2 The authors speculate: “What if indexed power loss (iPL) is dependent on body surface area (BSA)?” We wish to make the following points in response:

  1. The data extracted from our paper2 that includes 30 patients shows no statistically significant correlation (p=0.167) between iPL and BSA (see online supplementary figure). This clarifies the speculation and supports our conclusion: ‘iPL correlates with exercise capacity’. We believe this is not surprising given …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were fully involved in the study design, data analysis and interpretation of results, preparation of the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval All the study protocols complied with the Institutional Review Boards of CHOP and the Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles