Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and its association with heritable connective tissue disorders
  1. Stanislav Henkin1,
  2. Sara M Negrotto1,
  3. Marysia S Tweet1,2,
  4. Salman Kirmani3,4,
  5. David R Deyle3,
  6. Rajiv Gulati1,2,
  7. Timothy M Olson2,5,
  8. Sharonne N Hayes1,2
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  3. 3Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  4. 4Division of Women and Child Health, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  5. 5Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sharonne N Hayes, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905, USA; Hayes.Sharonne{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

Objective Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an under-recognised but important cause of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. We sought to determine the role of medical and molecular genetic screening for connective tissue disorders in patients with SCAD.

Methods We performed a single-centre retrospective descriptive analysis of patients with spontaneous coronary artery disease who had undergone medical genetics evaluation 1984–2014 (n=116). The presence or absence of traits suggestive of heritable connective tissue disease was extracted. Genetic testing for connective tissue disorders and/or aortopathies, if performed, is also reported.

Results Of the 116 patients (mean age 44.2 years, 94.8% women and 41.4% with non-coronary fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD)), 59 patients underwent genetic testing, of whom 3 (5.1%) received a diagnosis of connective tissue disorder: a 50-year-old man with Marfan syndrome; a 43-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome and FMD; and a 45-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. An additional 12 patients (20.3%) had variants of unknown significance, none of which was thought to be a definite disease-causing mutation based on in silico analyses.

Conclusions Only a minority of patients with SCAD who undergo genetic evaluation have a likely pathogenic mutation identified on gene panel testing. Even fewer exhibit clinical features of connective tissue disorder. These findings underscore the need for further studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of SCAD.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.