PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jayan Parameshwar AU - Rachel Hogg AU - Sally Rushton AU - Rhiannon Taylor AU - Steven Shaw AU - Jenny Mehew AU - Andre Simon AU - Guy A MacGowan AU - Jonathan R Dalzell AU - Nawwar Al Attar AU - Rajamiyer Venkateswaran AU - Hoong Sern Lim AU - Stephan Schueler AU - Steven Tsui AU - Nicholas Robert Banner TI - Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population AID - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313355 DP - 2019 Feb 01 TA - Heart PG - 291--296 VI - 105 IP - 4 4099 - http://heart.bmj.com/content/105/4/291.short 4100 - http://heart.bmj.com/content/105/4/291.full SO - Heart2019 Feb 01; 105 AB - Objective To study the survival and patient outcome in a population of UK patients supported by an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation.Methods Data on all adult patients (n=342) who received a HeartMate II or HVAD as a first long-term LVAD between January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were extracted from the UK Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) Database in November 2015. Outcomes analysed include survival on a LVAD, time to urgent listing, heart transplantation and complications including those needing a pump exchange.Results 112 patients were supported with the Thoratec HeartMate II and 230 were supported with the HeartWare HVAD. Median duration of support was 534 days. During the study period, 81 patients required moving to the UK urgent waiting list for heart transplantation. Of the 342 patients, 85 (24.8%) received a heart transplant, this included 63 on the urgent list. Thirty-day survival was 88.9%, while overall patient survival at 3 years from LVAD implant was 49.6%. 156 patients (46%) died during LVAD support; the most common cause of death on a VAD was a cerebrovascular accident. There was no significant difference between the two devices used in any outcome.Conclusions In a population of patients with advanced heart failure, who have a very poor prognosis, support with an implantable LVAD allowed a quarter to receive a heart transplant in a 3-year period. Overall survival of the cohort was about 50%. With improvement in technology and in post-LVAD management, it is likely that outcomes will improve further.