PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Milena Soriano Marcolino
AU  - Luciana Marques Maia
AU  - João Antonio Queiroz Oliveira
AU  - Laura Defensor Ribeiro Melo
AU  - Bruno Leonardo Duarte Pereira
AU  - Diomildo Ferreira Andrade-Junior
AU  - Eric Boersma
AU  - Antonio Luiz Ribeiro
TI  - Impact of telemedicine interventions on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314539
DP  - 2019 Oct 01
TA  - Heart
PG  - 1479--1486
VI  - 105
IP  - 19
4099  - http://heart.bmj.com/content/105/19/1479.short
4100  - http://heart.bmj.com/content/105/19/1479.full
SO  - Heart2019 Oct 01; 105
AB  - Background Despite the promise of telemedicine to improve care for ischaemic heart disease, there are significant obstacles to implementation. Demonstrating improvement in patient-centred outcomes is important to support development of these innovative strategies.Objective To assess the impact of telemedicine interventions on mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods Articles were searched in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Base de Dados de Enfermagem (BDENF), Indice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud (IBECs), Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, from January 2004 to January 2018. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. In-hospital mortality (primary outcome), and door-to-balloon (DTB) time, 30-day mortality and long-term mortality (secondary outcomes) were assessed. Random effects models were applied to estimate pooled results.Results Thirty non-randomised controlled and seven quasi-experimental studies were included (16 960 patients). They were classified as moderate or serious risk of bias by ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions tool). In 31 studies, the intervention was prehospital ECG transmission. Telemedicine was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality compared with usual care (relative risk (RR) 0.63(95% confidence interval[CI] 0.55 to 0.72); I2 ⇓ <0.001%). DTB time was consistently reduced (mean difference −28 (95% CI −35 to –20) min), but showed large heterogeneity (I2=94%). Thirty-day mortality (RR 0.62;95% CI 0.43 to 0.85) and long-term mortality (RR 0.61(95% CI 0.40 to 0.92)) were also reduced, with moderate heterogeneity (I2=52%).Conclusions There is moderate-quality evidence that telemedicine strategies, in particular ECG transmission, combined with the usual care for AMI are associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and very-low quality evidence that they reduce DTB time, 30-day mortality and long-term mortality.