TY - JOUR T1 - 27 Animation supported consent in patients with acute coronary syndrome transferred for urgent angiography and angioplasty JF - Heart JO - Heart SP - A22 LP - A24 DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-BCS.27 VL - 106 IS - Suppl 2 AU - David Wald AU - Ollie Casey-Gillman AU - Katrina Comer AU - Josephine Mansell AU - Howie Teoh AU - Kyriacos Mouyis AU - Matthew Kelham AU - Fiona Chan AU - Selda Ahmet AU - Max Sayers AU - Vincent McCaughan AU - Nito Polenio Y1 - 2020/07/01 UR - http://heart.bmj.com/content/106/Suppl_2/A22.abstract N2 - Introduction Patient understanding of angiography and angioplasty is often incomplete at the time of consent. Language barriers and time constraints are significant obstacles, particularly in the urgent setting, where the procedures are unplanned. We introduced digital animations to support consent for inter-hospital transfer patients with acute coronary syndromes and assessed the effect of on patient understanding.Methods Multi-language animations explaining angiography and angioplasty, (www.explainmyprocedure.com/heart) were introduced at nine district hospitals for patients with acute coronary syndrome (non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina) before urgent transfer to a cardiac centre for their procedure. Patients watched the animations on wards using personal devices or internet-free videobooks. Reported understanding of the reason for transfer, the procedure, its benefits and risks in 100 consecutive patients were recorded before introduction of the animations into practice (no animation group) and in 100 consecutive patients after their introduction (animation group). Patient understanding in the 2 groups was compared. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the pathway.Results Table 1 shows the characteristics of patients in the animation and no animation groups. Following introduction, 83/100 patients reported they had watched the animation before inter-hospital transfer (3 declined and 14 were overlooked). The proportions of patients who understood the reason for transfer, the procedure, its benefits and risks, in the no animation group (n=100) were respectively, 58%, 38%, 25% and 7% and in the animation group (n=100), 85%, 81%, 73% and 61% (p<0.001 for all comparisons, figure 1).View this table:Abstract 27 Table 1 Characteristics of patients interviewed before and after introduction of animations to support consentAbstract 27 Figure 1 Sequence for 100 patients before (A) and 100 patients after (B) introduction of animation supported consent initiativeAbstract 27 Figure 2 Patient-reported understanding before consent for urgent angiography and angioplasty among patients in the no animation group (n=100) and patients in the animation group (n=100)Conclusion Use of animations explaining angiography and angioplasty is feasible before urgent inter-hospital transfer and was associated with about a 2-fold improvement in understanding of the benefits and a 9-fold improvement in understanding of the risks. The approach is not limited to cardiology and has the potential to be applied to all specialties in medicine.Conflict of Interest Founder of Explain my Procedure ER -