TY - JOUR T1 - Cumulative burden of clinically significant aortic stenosis in community-dwelling older adults JF - Heart JO - Heart DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319025 SP - heartjnl-2021-319025 AU - David S Owens AU - Traci M Bartz AU - Petra Buzkova AU - Daniele Massera AU - Mary L Biggs AU - Selma D Carlson AU - Bruce M Psaty AU - Nona Sotoodehnia AU - John S Gottdiener AU - Jorge R Kizer Y1 - 2021/06/02 UR - http://heart.bmj.com/content/early/2021/06/01/heartjnl-2021-319025.abstract N2 - Objectives Current estimates of aortic stenosis (AS) frequency have mostly relied on cross-sectional echocardiographic or longitudinal administrative data, making understanding of AS burden incomplete. We performed case adjudications to evaluate the frequency of AS and assess differences by age, sex and race in an older cohort with long-term follow-up.Methods We developed case-capture methods using study echocardiograms, procedure and diagnosis codes, heart failure events and deaths for targeted review of medical records in the Cardiovascular Health Study to identify moderate or severe AS and related procedures or hospitalisations. The primary outcome was clinically significant AS (severe AS or procedure). Assessment of incident AS burden was based on subdistribution survival methods, while associations with age, sex and race relied on cause-specific survival methods.Results The cohort comprised 5795 participants (age 73±6, 42.2% male, 14.3% Black). Cumulative frequency of clinically significant AS at maximal 25-year follow-up was 3.69% (probable/definite) to 4.67% (possible/probable/definite), while the corresponding 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.88% to 3.71%. Of incident cases, about 85% had a hospitalisation for severe AS, but roughly half did not undergo valve intervention. The adjusted incidence of clinically significant AS was higher in men (HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.21 to 2.17]) and increased with age (HR 1.08 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.11]), but was lower in Blacks (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.81]).Conclusions In this community-based study, we identified a higher burden of clinically significant AS than reported previously, with differences by age, sex and race. These findings have important implications for public health resource planning, although the lower burden in Blacks merits further study.Data are available from the authors on reasonable request. ER -