PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - A. M. al Zaghal
AU  - J. Li
AU  - R. H. Anderson
AU  - C. Lincoln
AU  - D. Shore
AU  - M. L. Rigby
TI  - Anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of sinus venosus defects.
AID  - 10.1136/hrt.78.3.298
DP  - 1997 Sep 01
TA  - Heart
PG  - 298--304
VI  - 78
IP  - 3
4099  - http://heart.bmj.com/content/78/3/298.short
4100  - http://heart.bmj.com/content/78/3/298.full
SO  - Heart1997 Sep 01; 78
AB  - BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of sinus venosus defects remains a matter of debate. It is crucial to provide solid anatomical criteria, by identifying the very nature of the atrial septum relative to sinus venosus defects, to diagnose and differentiate them from other interatrial communications. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to reestablish the anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of sinus venosus defects. METHODS: Five specimens with sinus venosus defects from the cardiopathological museum were examined. Study of the abnormal hearts was supplemented by examining the extent and structure of the atrial septum in 10 normal hearts. The echocardiograms and surgical notes were reviewed from 18 patients seen between July 1991 and August 1996 at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London diagnosed preoperatively to have a sinus venosus defect. RESULTS: The nature of the oval fossa and its muscular borders were identified in the normal hearts. In all three autopsied specimens of the superior variety of sinus venosus defect, the mouth of the superior caval vein was overriding the intact muscular anterosuperior border of the oval fossa. Two specimens thought initially to have the inferior variety of sinus venosus defect were re-classified as having defects within the oval fossa as it was the deficient oval fossa itself, rather than its intact muscular border, that was overridden by the mouth of the inferior caval vein. Sixteen patients had been diagnosed echocardiographically as exhibiting the superior variant of the defect. Retrospective review showed overriding of the superior caval vein across the upper rim of the oval fossa in 12 patients. These findings were confirmed by surgery in 11 patients with the 12th awaiting operation. Overriding of the fossa by the caval vein was not found in the other four patients. Surgery in all of these showed the defect to be within the oval fossa. In two patients diagnosed echocardiographically as having inferior defects, the surgical findings confirmed a biatrial connection of the inferior caval vein in one patient, the findings in the second were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: The key anatomical criterion for the diagnosis of sinus venosus defects is overriding of the mouth of the superior or inferior caval vein across the intact muscular border of the oval fossa. The interatrial communication is then formed within the mouth of the overriding vein, and is outside the confines of the oval fossa.