Table 3

Odds ratios for 30 day mortality after CABG

Risk factorStudy (year)Odds ratio95% CI
CI, confidence interval; FEM, fixed effects model; REM, random effects model.
Female versus maleBarbir (1994)3.10(0.88 to 10.89)
Brandup (1995)2.75(1.62 to 4.68)
Capdeville (2001)2.07(1.59 to 10.33)
Corbineau (1999)1.38(0.86 to 2.21)
Elisheva (2000)2.01(1.43 to 2.83)
Mesh (1997)1.67(0.61 to 4.58)
Rao (1996)1.37(0.91 to 2.07)
Wong (1999)3.91(1.68 to 9.08)
Meta-analysis result (REM, k=8)1.92(1.49 to 2.48)
Diabetes versus no diabetesBrandup (1995)2.11(1.12 to 3.96)
Corbineau (1999)1.76(0.96 to 3.23)
Del Rizzo (1998)1.76(0.98 to 3.15)
Mesh (1997)0.40(0.15 to 1.06)
Rao (1996)1.93(1.30 to 2.86)
Meta-analysis result (REM, k=5)1.57(0.88 to 2.80)
Age >70 versus ⩽70Brandup (1995)1.84(1.05 to 3.22)
Corbineau (1999)2.13(1.43 to 3.16)
Del Rizzo (1998)2.33(1.32 to 4.11)
Elisheva (2000)2.48(1.79 to 3.43)
Rao (1996)3.07(2.09 to 4.50)
Meta-analysis result (FEM, k=5)2.42(2.00 to 2.80)
Prior heart surgery versus no prior heart surgeryCorbineau (1999)3.51(1.60 to 7.69)
Del Rizzo (1998)7.05(3.21 to 15.47)
Elisheva (2000)1.32(0.61 to 2.86)
Prior MI versus no prior MIBrandup (1995)1.69(0.96 to 2.98)
Corbineau (1999)1.56(1.05 to 2.32)
Rao (1996)1.93(1.25 to 2.99)
Hypertension versus no hypertensionBrandup (1995)1.73(1.03 to 2.89)
Elisheva (2000)1.70(1.20 to 2.40)
Rao (1996)1.71(1.15 to 2.54)