Table 3

 Between-group and within-group comparisons between patients with coronary heart disease of hospital-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation with regard to haemostatic indices and endothelial function at baseline and after completion of a cardiac rehabilitation programme

Hospital (n = 40)Home (n = 41)IntergroupBaseline*HospitalBaseline−AfterHomeBaseline−AfterGroup×Rehab effects‡
p Valuep Valuep ValueF1,79p Value
FMD, flow-mediated dilatation; NMD, nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation; PV, plasma viscosity; sP-sel, soluble P-selectin; vWf, von Willebrand factor.
*Unpaired Student’s t or Mann–Whitney U tests; †paired Student’s t or Wilcoxon signed ranks tests; ‡two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures of the rehabilitation effect. Group×rehabilitation indicates group-by-rehabilitation interactions.
vWfbaseline (IU/dl)201 (61)182 (56)0.15
vWfafter173 (52)168 (51)<0.0010.0011.770.19
Fibrinogenbaseline (g/l)3.28 (0.7)3.21 (0.9)0.74
Fibrinogenafter2.94 (0.8)2.80 (0.6)<0.0010.0030.420.52
D-dimerbaseline (mg/l)0.28 (0.22–0.45)0.26 (0.21–0.43)0.48
D-dimerafter0.20 (0.12–0.28)0.20 (0.10–0.30)<0.001<0.0010.050.83
sP-selbaseline (ng/ml)82 (72–92)80 (75–95)0.87
sP-selafter79 (68–94)81 (71–89)0.210.270.0020.96
PVbaseline (mPas)1.71 (0.14)1.71 (0.15)0.86
PVafter1.59 (0.13)1.65 (0.13)<0.0010.0181.10.29
FMDbaseline (%)4.45 (1.70–6.69)4.14 (1.22–6.17)0.49
FMDafter7.50 (4.86–11.7)6.80 (1.75–11.3)0.0210.0060.590.44
NMDbaseline (%)14.1 (11.3–18.1)13.2 (9.41–16.4)0.27
NMDafter14.3 (11.2–20.0)13.2 (8.83–16.5)0.230.522.120.15