Table 4

 IRRs from trials of sirolimus and paclitaxel eluting stents and RIRR comparing sirolimus with paclitaxel in patients without diabetes

StudyIRR (95% confidence interval)
In-stent restenosisIn-segment restenosisTLRMACE
*I2, test of heterogeneity.
Sirolimus trials
SIRIUS (2003)40.05 (0.02 to 0.14)0.20 (0.11 to 0.34)0.21 (0.11 to 0.40)0.39 (0.25 to 0.62)
E-SIRIUS (2003)10.09 (0.03 to 0.24)0.13 (0.05 to 0.30)0.20 (0.08 to 0.52)0.42 (0.20 to 0.85)
C-SIRIUS (2004)30.04 (0.002 to 0.68)0.03 (0.002 to 0.54)0.13 (0.02 to 1.00)0.13 (0.02 to 1.00)
RAVEL (2004)20.02 (0.001 to 0.37)0.02 (0.001 to 0.37)0.02 (0.001 to 0.41)0.20 (0.08 to 0.53)
SES-SMART (2002)8NA0.11 (0.04 to 0.28)NANA
Combined IRR0.06 (0.03 to 0.12)0.15 (0.10 to 0.22)0.19 (0.11 to 0.31)0.35 (0.25 to 0.50)
Heterogeneity*0.0%, p = 0.778.8%, p = 0.360.0%, p = 0.520.0%, p = 0.44
Paclitaxel trials
TAXUS I (2003)5NANA0.16 (0.01 to 3.13)0.28 (0.03 to 2.53)
TAXUS II (2003)6, 32, 33NA0.08 (0.02 to 0.24)0.29 (0.14 to 0.61)NA
TAXUS IV (2004)7, 290.25 (0.13 to 0.47)0.35 (0.20 to 0.59)0.30 (0.19 to 0.48)NA
TAXUS VI (2004)310.30 (0.17 to 0.53)0.39 (0.24 to 0.64)0.49 (0.27 to 0.88)0.80 (0.49 to 1.29)
Combined IRR0.28 (0.18 to 0.42)0.32 (0.23 to 0.45)0.35 (0.25 to 0.48)0.76 (0.48 to 1.22)
Heterogeneity*0.0%, p = 0.6769.2%, p = 0.040.0%, p = 0.530.0%, p = 0.37
RIRR (sirolimus v paclitaxel)0.21 (0.10 to 0.48) p<0.0010.47 (0.24 to 0.92) p = 0.0270.54 (0.30 to 0.99) p = 0.0450.46 (0.26 to 0.83) p = 0.010