Table 4

Regression analysis demonstrating the association between the ratio of VO2 max/predicted VO2 and various potential predictors, in the entire study population

Univariate analysis
Variableβp Value
Clinical
 Age−0.160.3
 Gender−0.100.4
 Body surface area−0.200.2
 Hypertension−0.0020.9
 β Blockers−0.090.5
 Calcium channel blockers−0.10.4
 New York Heart Association class−0.10.5
 Resting heart rate−0.060.7
 Resting systolic blood pressure−0.0040.9
 Resting diastolic blood pressure0.0170.9
Echocardiography
 Deceleration time0.160.3
 E/E′ ratio−0.080.7
 Myocardial performance index0.030.9
 LV end-diastolic stiffness−0.200.4
 Resting peak LVOT gradient−0.110.5
 Provokable (pre-stress) peak LVOT gradient (amyl nitrite or Valsalva)−0.120.5
 Post stress peak LVOT gradient−0.200.4
 Resting mitral regurgitation−0.060.7
 Post-stress mitral regurgitation−0.060.7
Cardiac magnetic resonance
 Basal end-diastolic interventricular septal thickness−0.20.2
 Left atrial area index−0.170.3
 Left ventricular end-systolic index0.180.3
 Left ventricular end-diastolic index0.10.5
 Left ventricular ejection fraction−0.050.8
 Left ventricular mass index−0.090.6
 Degree of delayed hyperenhancement−0.160.3
 Ascending aortic distensibility0.310.03
 Pulse wave velocity−0.320.03
  • Because aortic stiffness was the only significant variable, multivariable analysis was not performed.

  • LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract.