Table 5

The main outcomes of the study stratified according to device type

5-Year cumulative incidence and 95% CIICD only versus CRT–ICD, log-rank p
Entire cohort (n=334)ICD only (n=298)CRT–ICD (n=36)*
CVS mortality end point8% (4 to 12)6% (2 to 10)21% (5 to 37)<0.0001
Appropriate shocks13% (7 to 19)10% (6 to 14)34% (12 to 56)0.002
Inappropriate shocks21% (15 to 27)21% (15 to 27)22% (6 to 38)0.632
Implant complications21% (15 to 27)19% (13 to 25)36% (18 to 54)0.002
Adverse ICD events34% (28 to 40)34% (28 to 40)39% (21 to 57)0.113
  • * CRT–ICD recipients had a lower FS and had more symptoms than did the rest of the cohort (FS, fractional shortening: 30% vs 39%, respectively (p<0.0001); NYHA, New York Heart Association III/IV: 29% vs 7%, respectively (p=0.003)).

  • ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT, cardiac resynchronisation therapy; CVS, cardiovascular.