Table 2

Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness test performance in original units and METs pre- vs post-cardiac rehabilitation (CR)

Test*Sample sizePre-CRPost-CRChange (95% CI)Effect size (d)Pre (METs)Post (METs)Change (95% CI)Effect size (d)
aBruce treadmill test (s)n=125329 (132)451 (153)121 (81 to 140)0.856.8 (2.1)7.5 (2.4)0.76 (0.40 to 1.12)0.58
aIncremental shuttle test (m)n=104295 (132)455 (190)160.1 (136.2 to 184.1)0.994.4 (0.59)5.1 (0.85)0.70 (0.58 to 0.86)0.96
a6-min walk test (m)n=54279 (144)329 (148)50.3 (18.8 to 81.6)0.343.2 (0.97)3.6 (0.99)0.33 (0.13 to 0.54)0.34
bIncremental cycle ergometry (W)n=10387.6 (19.1)98.5 (19.1)10.9 (8.6 to 12.2)0.575.6 (0.8)6.0 (0.8)0.40 (0.31 to 0.51)0.55
bIncremental shuttle test (m)n=118295 (139)362 (155)67.0 (51.6 to 83.6)0.464.6 (0.7)5.0 (0.7)0.40 (0.30 to 0.52)0.57
cIncremental shuttle test (m)n=81420 (157)503 (179)82.5 (53.9 to 111.3)0.495.2 (0.76)5.5 (0.84)0.37 (0.25 to 0.48)0.46
dIncremental shuttle test (m)n=365341 (165)411 (230)71.5 (57.6 to 85.4)0.464.9 (0.83)5.4 (0.94)0.51 (0.46 to 0.56)0.58
Pooled fixed effect model:n=9500.52 (0.51 to 0.53)0.59 (95%CI 0.58 to 0.60)
  • *Superscripts a–d designate the four centres which participated.

  • Effect size (d), Cohen's d; MET, metabolic equivalent; Post-CR, exercise test at exit from phase III cardiac rehabilitation; Pre-CR, exercise test at entry to phase III cardiac rehabilitation.