Table 4

Changes in mitral regurgitation severity following TAVR

First author, year (ref.)Sample size≥Moderate MRProsthesis typeImproved
n (%)
Same
n (%)
Worsened
n (%)
p Value
Tzikas, 20102179 (46)*10SEV8 (17.4)*28 (60.9)*10 (10.3)*
Gotzmann, 2010223919SEV7 (17.9)23 (59.0)9 (9.3)
De Chiara, 2011235816SEV2 (3.4)47 (81.0)9 (15.5)
Samin, 201124186BEV7 (38.9)11 (61.1)0 (0)
Hekimian, 2012259933BEV28 (28.3)60 (60.6)11 (11.1)
Toggweiler, 201226451132 (123)†BEV81 (65.9)†38 (30.9)†4 (3.3)†
Hutter, 20132726860 (31)‡Both21 (67.7)‡9 (29.0)‡1 (3.2)‡
Giordana, 2013283535Both25 (71.4)10 (28.6)0 (0)
Bedgoni, 20139829261SEV108 (13.0)668 (80.6)53 (6.4)
Pooled data for all patients
 SEV1005144 (14.3)779 (77.5)82 (8.2)<0.001
 BEV270141 (52.2)114 (42.2)15 (5.6)<0.001
 Overall1278287 (22.5)894 (70.0)97 (7.6)<0.001
Pooled data for patients with ≥moderate MR
 SEV326133 (40.8)185 (56.7)8 (2.5)<0.001
 BEV192128 (66.7)60 (31.3)4 (2.1)<0.001
 Overall521263 (50.5)246 (47.2)12 (2.3)<0.001
  • *Calculated for 46 patients with available echocardiographic data at follow-up.

  • †Calculated for 123 patients with ≥moderate MR and echocardiographic follow-up at 1 year (9 patients with ≥moderate MR died in the follow-up).

  • ‡Calculated for 31 patients with ≥moderate MR and echocardiographic follow-up at 6 months (19 patients died and 10 patients did not have an echocardiogram at 6-month follow-up).

  • BEV, balloon-expandable valve; MR, mitral regurgitation; SEV, self-expandable valve; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.