TableĀ 4

RR of CHD in twins versus singletons, according to CHD severity and chorionicity

CHD severityTwins (any chorionicity)
RR (95% CI); p value
Dichorionic twins
RR (95% CI); p value
Monochorionic twins
RR (95% CI); p value
UnadjustedAdjusted*UnadjustedAdjusted*UnadjustedAdjusted*
All CHD1.73 (1.48 to 2.04); p<0.0011.75 (1.48 to 2.06); p<0.0011.49 (1.22 to 1.83); p<0.0011.51 (1.24 to 1.86); p<0.0012.72 (2.04 to 3.62); p<0.0012.76 (2.07 to 3.69); p<0.001
Severe CHD1.78 (0.83 to 3.82); p=0.141.82 (0.85 to 3.90); p=0.121.41 (0.52 to 3.80); p=0.501.39 (0.51 to 3.76); p=0.523.92 (1.25 to 12.30); p=0.023.90 (1.24 to 12.27); p=0.02
Moderate CHD1.46 (1.02 to 2.10); p=0.041.54 (1.07 to 2.20); p=0.021.63 (1.09 to 2.43); p=0.021.67 (1.12 to 2.49); p=0.011.21 (0.50 to 2.92); p=0.671.24 (0.51 to 2.98); p=0.64
Mild CHD1.81 (1.49 to 2.20); p<0.0011.80 (1.47 to 2.20); p<0.0011.49 (1.16 to 1.91); p=0.0021.50 (1.17 to 1.13); p=0.0013.07 (2.20 to 4.28); p<0.0013.12 (2.23 to 4.36); p<0.001
  • *Adjusted for year of delivery and maternal age. Maternal age was missing in 29 (0.7%) singleton cases and so these cases were excluded. Maternal age data were missing in 2.1% of twins without CHD so these were excluded from the denominator.

  • CHD, congenital heart disease; RR, relative risk.