Table 4

Pooled safety outcomes with stroke prevention strategies directly compared with warfarin

Warfarin (events/n)Comparator (events/n)Pairwise meta-analysis,
odds ratio (95% CI)
Heterogeneity,
I2, p value
Major bleeding
 Warfarin vs NOAC1769/29 2112091/42 3040.77 (0.72 to 0.83)90.9%, p=0.001
 Warfarin vs LAAC18/24422/4630.63 (0.33 to 1.19)-
 Warfarin vs APT195/5859178/60120.92 (0.74 to 1.14)74.6%, p=0.001
 Warfarin vs placebo38/7708/9250.27 (0.12 to 0.63)71.4%, p=0.030
Intracranial bleeding
 Warfarin vs NOAC301/29 901203/43 0280.48 (0.40 to 0.57)52.0%, p=0.080
 Warfarin vs LAAC10/3824/7320.21 (0.06 to 0.71)41.9%, p=0.190
 Warfarin vs APT33/491716/50580.50 (0.28 to 0.92)0.0%, p=0.908
 Warfarin vs placebo2/7701/9250.58 (0.09 to 3.70)0.0%, p=0.701
Gastrointestinal bleeding
 Warfarin vs NOAC595/29 8501011/42 9431.12 (1.01 to 1.25)77.9%, p=0.001
 Warfarin vs LAAC21/3823/7220.24 (0.11 to 0.51)
 Warfarin vs APT9/8687/10650.56 (0.18 to 1.76)53.9%, p=0.114
 Warfarin vs placebo8/5601/7140.13 (0.02 to 0.76)0.0%, p=0.876
  • APT, antiplatelet therapy; LAAC, left atrial appendage closure; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.