Table 3

Follow-up findings at 4 weeks and 6 months for the two groups

FindingPARA group (n=44)ED group (n=42)p Value
Four-week follow-up
 Patients given a copy of their ECG34 (85)22 (63)0.035*
 Patients given written information about their condition24 (60)14 (40)0.10
 On antiarrhythmic drugs6 (14)5 (13)1.00
 On rate-controlling drugs11 (25)16 (41)0.16
 Seen a cardiologist21 (48)17 (36)0.83
 Offered a catheter ablation15 (34)11 (28)0.64
 ECG and written information not available4 (9)7 (17)0.35
 Follow-up data not available03 (7)0.11
Six-month follow-up
 On antiarrhythmic drugs7 (16)6 (15)1.00
 On rate-controlling drugs8 (18)13 (33)0.13
 Seen a cardiologist35 (80)26 (67)0.22
 Offered a catheter ablation23 (52)15 (38)0.27
 Undergone an echocardiogram28 (64)23 (62)0.64
 Had thyroid function test23 (59)10 (29)0.02*
 Further hospital admissions8 (18)7 (18)1.00
 Echocardiogram data not available3 (7)5 (12)0.48
 Thyroid function data not available5 (11)8 (19)0.38
 Follow-up data not available03 (7)0.11
  • Values are n (%).

  • ED, emergency department; PARA, treated by paramedic.