Table 2

Summary of findings for the comparison of intensified patient care versus usual care

OutcomesAnticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)Relative effect
(95% CI)
Participants (n)
(studies)
Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)
Risk with usual careRisk with intensified patient care
Medication adherence at ≤6 monthsStudy populationOR 1.93
(1.29 to 2.88)
11 204
(7 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊖†
MODERATE
 456 per 1000618 per 1000 (519 to 707)
Medication adherence at >6 monthsStudy populationOR 2.87
(1.91 to 4.29)
663
(3 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH
 705 per 1000873 per 1000 (820 to 911)
Reduction in LDL-C at ≤6 months (mg/dL)Mean reduction in LDL-C at ≤6 months (mg/dL) was 0Mean reduction in LDL-C at ≤6 months (mg/dL) in the intervention group was 19.51 greater (8.51 greater to 30.51 greater)333
(3 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊖†
MODERATE
Reduction in total serum cholesterol at ≤6 months (mg/dL)Mean reduction in total serum cholesterol at ≤6 months (mg/dL) was 0Mean reduction in total serum cholesterol at ≤6 months (mg/dL) in the intervention group was 17.15 greater (1.17 greater to 33.14 greater)430
(4 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊖⊖†‡
LOW
Reduction in total serum cholesterol at >6 mos (mg/dL)Mean reduction in total serum cholesterol at >6 months (mg/dL) was 0Mean reduction in total serum cholesterol at >6 months (mg/dL) in the intervention group was 17.57 greater (14.95 greater to 20.19 greater)127
(2 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH
  • GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group grades of evidence: high quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate. RCT, Randomised Controlled Trial; LDL-C, Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol.

  • *The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

  • †Downgraded due to heterogeneity.

  • ‡Downgraded due to wide CI.